Environmental Evidence

367 papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Environmental Evidence in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Evidence usually cover Ecology (127 papers), Global and Planetary Change (126 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (70 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (48 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (44 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Evidence are Neal Haddaway, Andrew S. Pullin, Biljana Macura, Nicola Randall, Katy James, Paul Whaley, Gillian Petrokofsky, Claes Bernes, Magnus Land and Christian Kohl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Evidence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Evidence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Evidence.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Evidence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Evidence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Evidence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Evidence more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025