Steffanie Scott

60 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Steffanie Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 341
  • Business and International Management 63
  • Plant Science 534
  • Food Science 216
  • Global and Planetary Change 252
Replace William G. Moseley with:
William G. Moseley United States
Jeroen Candel Netherlands
Marianne Penker Austria
Tālis Tīsenkopfs United Kingdom
Mindi Schneider Netherlands
Olivier De Schutter Belgium
Kees Jansen Netherlands
Caroline M. Saunders New Zealand
P.G.M. Hebinck Netherlands
Fred Magdoff United States
Steffanie Scott relative to William G. Moseley United States William G. Moseley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William G. Moseley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffanie Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffanie Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffanie Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffanie Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffanie Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffanie Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffanie Scott. The network helps show where Steffanie Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffanie Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffanie Scott Line = papers co-authored together Steffanie Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013105
2 201497
3 200690
4 201581
5 201675
6 201575
7 200857
8 201755
9 201753
10 201252
11 200847
12 200838
13 201933
14 200732
15 201632
16 201829
17 201529
18 201628
19 201427
20 201626

About Steffanie Scott

Steffanie Scott is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Food Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (22 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (16 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (12 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (7 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (6 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (6 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (341 citations), Business and International Management (63 citations), Plant Science (534 citations), Food Science (216 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (252 citations). Steffanie Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Zhenzhong Si, Theresa Schumilas, Taiyang Zhong, Aijuan Chen, Yuhui Qiao, Xianjin Huang, Kate Lloyd, Fiona Miller, Niels Halberg and Jonathan Crush. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Research, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement, Agriculture and Human Values and Gender Technology and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact