Kees Jansen

2.3k total citations
58 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Kees Jansen is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Strategy and Management and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kees Jansen has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 19 papers in Strategy and Management and 15 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Kees Jansen's work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (30 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (17 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (10 papers). Kees Jansen is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (30 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (17 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (10 papers). Kees Jansen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Mexico and Brazil. Kees Jansen's co-authors include Sietze Vellema, A. Castellanos-Navarrete, M.A. Slingerland, Juliana Gil, James F. Keeley, Diana Córdoba, A. van Huis, Catharina Wesseling, Héctor Javier Sánchez‐Pérez and Berna van Wendel de Joode and has published in prestigious journals such as Research Policy, World Development and Environmental Research.

In The Last Decade

Kees Jansen

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kees Jansen Netherlands 22 622 468 265 184 176 58 1.4k
Ryan E. Galt United States 27 738 1.2× 1.0k 2.2× 175 0.7× 158 0.9× 215 1.2× 54 1.9k
Annie Shattuck United States 16 845 1.4× 684 1.5× 230 0.9× 204 1.1× 115 0.7× 31 1.4k
David E. Ervin United States 18 413 0.7× 449 1.0× 212 0.8× 75 0.4× 254 1.4× 78 1.5k
Wolfgang Bokelmann Germany 21 437 0.7× 419 0.9× 156 0.6× 123 0.7× 124 0.7× 88 1.5k
Olivier De Schutter Belgium 18 708 1.1× 391 0.8× 152 0.6× 349 1.9× 216 1.2× 94 1.9k
João Augusto Rossi Borges Brazil 21 612 1.0× 431 0.9× 93 0.4× 112 0.6× 111 0.6× 48 1.7k
Sarah K. Lowder United States 9 574 0.9× 335 0.7× 92 0.3× 116 0.6× 180 1.0× 14 1.5k
Alejandra Engler Chile 17 543 0.9× 376 0.8× 158 0.6× 186 1.0× 217 1.2× 58 1.6k
Terri Raney Italy 7 557 0.9× 385 0.8× 85 0.3× 107 0.6× 152 0.9× 12 1.5k
Dagmar Mithöfer Germany 19 419 0.7× 466 1.0× 346 1.3× 46 0.3× 139 0.8× 65 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Kees Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees Jansen. The network helps show where Kees Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kees Jansen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kees Jansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kees Jansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kees Jansen. Kees Jansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2023). Incorporation of different types of farmers into different coffee markets. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement. 45(1). 161–180. 2 indexed citations
2.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2023). The control of transboundary plant diseases and the problem of the public good: Lessons from Fusarium wilt in banana. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 95(1). 2 indexed citations
3.
Gil, Juliana, et al.. (2021). The use of pesticides in developing countries and their impact on health and the right to food. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 114 indexed citations
4.
Harvey, Célia A., Marie J. Zwetsloot, Kees Jansen, et al.. (2021). Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 41(5). 62–62. 78 indexed citations
5.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2020). Pesticide risk perceptions among bystanders of aerial spraying on bananas in Costa Rica. Environmental Research. 189. 109877–109877. 12 indexed citations
6.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2018). The Politics of Counter-Expertise on Aerial Spraying: Social Movements Denouncing Pesticide Risk Governance in the Philippines. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 50(1). 99–124. 7 indexed citations
7.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2016). Acceptance of Human Feces-based Fertilizers in Fecophobic Ghana. Human Organization. 75(1). 97–107. 12 indexed citations
8.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2014). The novelty of simple and known technologies and the rhythm of farmer-centred innovation in family dairy farming in Brazil. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 13(2). 135–149. 11 indexed citations
9.
Córdoba, Diana, Kees Jansen, & Carolina González. (2014). The Malleability of Participation: The Politics of Agricultural Research under Neoliberalism in Bolivia. Development and Change. 45(6). 1284–1309. 15 indexed citations
10.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2013). Pesticide risk perceptions and the differences between farmers and extensionists: Towards a knowledge-in-context model. Environmental Research. 124. 43–53. 72 indexed citations
11.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2013). Social movements and risk perception: unions, churches, pesticides and bananas in Costa Rica. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 19(1). 11–21. 16 indexed citations
12.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (2011). Pesticide use in banana and plantain production and risk perception among local actors in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Environmental Research. 111(5). 708–717. 69 indexed citations
13.
Gibescu, Madeleine, et al.. (2011). Round-the-Year Security Analysis With Large-Scale Wind Power Integration. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 3(1). 85–93. 13 indexed citations
14.
Novo, André, Kees Jansen, M.A. Slingerland, & K.E. Giller. (2010). Biofuel, dairy production and beef in Brazil: competing claims on land use in São Paulo state. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 37(4). 769–792. 54 indexed citations
15.
Jansen, Kees & Sietze Vellema. (2004). Agribusiness and Society. Bloomsbury Academic eBooks. 63 indexed citations
16.
Jansen, Kees. (2002). Plaguicidas y su regulación en Honduras. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 43(2). 273–289. 5 indexed citations
17.
Jansen, Kees. (2000). Labour, Livelihoods and the Quality of Life in Organic Agriculture in Europe. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 17(3). 247–278. 66 indexed citations
18.
Jansen, Kees, et al.. (1998). Modernizing Insecurity: The Land Titling Project in Honduras. Development and Change. 29(1). 81–106. 73 indexed citations
19.
Jansen, Kees. (1996). Ecological dilemmas of coffee exports and local food production in North-West Honduras.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 60(60). 7–30. 1 indexed citations
20.
Jansen, Kees. (1995). The art of burning and the politics of indigenous agricultural knowledge.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 676–708. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026