Asia Pacific Viewpoint

About

The 742 papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint usually cover Sociology and Political Science (481 papers), Political Science and International Relations (224 papers) and Demography (201 papers) specifically the topics of Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (140 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (114 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia Pacific Viewpoint are John Connell, Carol Farbotko, Jerome L. McElroy, Sarah Turner, Godfrey Baldacchino, Sarah Milne, Regina Scheyvens, Lesley Potter, George Curry and Geoff Bertram.

In The Last Decade

Asia Pacific Viewpoint

680 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Asia Pacific Viewpoint

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia Pacific Viewpoint more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026