Replace Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography with:
Singapore Journal of Tropical GeographyUnited Kingdom
Progress in Development StudiesUnited Kingdom
Critique of AnthropologyUnited States
Journal of Planning LiteratureUnited States
Cultural GeographiesUnited Kingdom
Organization & EnvironmentUnited States
Dialogues in Human GeographyUnited Kingdom
South African Geographical JournalSouth Africa
International Planning StudiesUnited Kingdom
Bulletin of Indonesian Economic StudiesAustralia
Singapore Journal of Tropical GeographyUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Asia Pacific Viewpoint · 1×
×0.95.2kSPS
×0.61.3kDEMOG
×1.02.1kPSIR
×1.32.2kGPC
×1.01.0kGABS
Citations per year, relative to Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Asia Pacific Viewpoint · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia Pacific Viewpoint more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint
This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia Pacific Viewpoint.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.