Starling David Hunter
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Accounting
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers)Media Influence and Politics (4 papers)Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the Association for Information SystemsEuropean Journal of Information Systems
- Partner nations
- United StatesQatarUnited Arab Emirates
In The Last Decade
Starling David Hunter
26 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Sociology and Political Science 58
- Strategy and Management 57
- Management Information Systems 54
- Accounting 35
- Economics and Econometrics 34
Countries citing papers authored by Starling David Hunter
This map shows the geographic impact of Starling David Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Starling David Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Starling David Hunter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Starling David Hunter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Starling David Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Starling David Hunter. The network helps show where Starling David Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Starling David Hunter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Starling David Hunter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Starling David Hunter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Starling David Hunter. Starling David Hunter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | A Semi-Automated Method of Network Text Analysis Applied to 150 Original Screenplays | 1 |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | Have Business Method Patents Gotten a Bum Rap? Some Empirical Evidence | 3 |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Starling David Hunter
Starling David Hunter is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, General Social Sciences and Strategy and Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Media Influence and Politics (4 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (54 citations), Strategy and Management (57 citations) and Accounting (35 citations). Starling David Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Kobelsky, Vernon J. Richardson, Susan Smith, Ravi Chinta and Timothy N. Carroll. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and European Journal of Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.