Anne C. Rouse

459 total citations
31 papers, 230 citations indexed

About

Anne C. Rouse is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne C. Rouse has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 230 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Management Information Systems, 10 papers in Strategy and Management and 7 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Anne C. Rouse's work include Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (16 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (8 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers). Anne C. Rouse is often cited by papers focused on Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (16 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (8 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers). Anne C. Rouse collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Canada. Anne C. Rouse's co-authors include Brian Corbitt, Martin Dick, Nicholas Beaumont, Heiko Gewald, David Watson, Benoit A. Aubert, David Watson, David Watson, Robert J. McQueen and Jacob L. Cybulski and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Information Technology and People and AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems.

In The Last Decade

Anne C. Rouse

24 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne C. Rouse Australia 7 114 68 56 30 29 31 230
Elad Harison Israel 6 49 0.4× 53 0.8× 97 1.7× 18 0.6× 26 0.9× 22 237
Jean‐Fabrice Lebraty France 10 55 0.5× 41 0.6× 45 0.8× 25 0.8× 15 0.5× 32 190
Seyed Mohammadbagher Jafari Iran 8 78 0.7× 25 0.4× 71 1.3× 33 1.1× 15 0.5× 32 274
Tom McMaster United Kingdom 9 65 0.6× 30 0.4× 43 0.8× 43 1.4× 14 0.5× 16 243
Gamel O. Wiredu Ghana 8 74 0.6× 24 0.4× 40 0.7× 66 2.2× 16 0.6× 18 266
Barbara C. McNurlin United States 6 172 1.5× 14 0.2× 68 1.2× 56 1.9× 21 0.7× 7 320
Jeremy Hutchison‐Krupat United Kingdom 7 49 0.4× 49 0.7× 113 2.0× 12 0.4× 14 0.5× 14 258
Lisa F. Seymour South Africa 8 110 1.0× 16 0.2× 27 0.5× 40 1.3× 17 0.6× 50 224
Jessica K. Winkler Germany 4 192 1.7× 18 0.3× 107 1.9× 79 2.6× 37 1.3× 8 255
Ulrike Baumöl Germany 8 51 0.4× 16 0.2× 36 0.6× 35 1.2× 24 0.8× 49 228

Countries citing papers authored by Anne C. Rouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne C. Rouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne C. Rouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne C. Rouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne C. Rouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne C. Rouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne C. Rouse. The network helps show where Anne C. Rouse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne C. Rouse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne C. Rouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne C. Rouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne C. Rouse. Anne C. Rouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kock, Nereu F., et al.. (2017). Topic negotiation in information systems action research. Figshare. 26–36. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rouse, Anne C., et al.. (2017). Quality Certification: Lessons from Three Software Development Organisations. Figshare. 3 indexed citations
3.
Alojail, Mohammed, Anne C. Rouse, & Brian Corbitt. (2012). The impact of ITIL (information technology infrastructure library) recommended practices on the IT outsourcing relationship. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–10. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gewald, Heiko & Anne C. Rouse. (2012). Comparing Business Process and IT Outsourcing Risks--An Exploratory Study in Germany and Australasia. 35. 275–284. 4 indexed citations
5.
Rouse, Anne C.. (2010). A Preliminary Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–10. 76 indexed citations
6.
Rouse, Anne C.. (2008). Testing Some Myths About IT Outsourcing: A Survey of Australia's Top 1000 Firms. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–13. 3 indexed citations
7.
Rouse, Anne C. & Brian Corbitt. (2007). Understanding Information Systems Outsourcing Success and Risks Through the Lens of Cognitive Biases. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1167–1178. 5 indexed citations
8.
Rouse, Anne C., et al.. (2007). Explaining and Predicting Information Systems Acceptance and Success: An Integrative Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1356–1367. 11 indexed citations
9.
Rouse, Anne C.. (2006). Explaining I.T. outsourcing purchasers' dissatisfaction. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–14. 4 indexed citations
10.
Rouse, Anne C.. (2005). The role of benchmarking and service level agreement (SLA) practices in IT outsourcing success. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 670–682. 2 indexed citations
11.
Rouse, Anne C. & Brian Corbitt. (2004). IT-supported business process outsourcing (BPO): The good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–14. 32 indexed citations
12.
Rouse, Anne C. & Brian Corbitt. (2003). Minimising risks in IT outsourcing: Choosing target services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 927–940. 10 indexed citations
13.
Rouse, Anne C.. (2003). The Australian Government's Abandoned Infrastructure Outsourcing Program: what can be learned?. AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems. 10(2). 2 indexed citations
14.
Rouse, Anne C. & Brian Corbitt. (2002). Revisiting IT outsourcing risks : re-analysis of a recent survey. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 2 indexed citations
15.
Rouse, Anne C. & Brian Corbitt. (2002). The Australian Government`s abandoned infrastructure outsourcing program: "fiasco" or relatively typical?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–10. 4 indexed citations
16.
Rouse, Anne C., et al.. (1997). Software quality certification: Valuable lessons from three software development organisations. 43–52.
17.
Rouse, Anne C., et al.. (1996). Software Quality Certification: identifying the real obstacles. AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems. 3(2). 3 indexed citations
18.
Rouse, Anne C., et al.. (1995). Getting and Keeping software quality certification: Some associated issues.. European Conference on Information Systems. 1077–1086. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rouse, Anne C., et al.. (1995). System Development Practices: A Comparison of the Experience of Australian and United States' Organizations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 36. 2 indexed citations
20.
Dick, Martin & Anne C. Rouse. (1995). The introduction of object -orientation in Austarlian software development organisations: The applicability of diffusion in innovation theory.. European Conference on Information Systems. 735–748. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026