Stacy M. Kelly
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 2%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Karen E. WolffeDerrick W. SmithGaylen KappermanThomas J. SmithPaul M. AjuwonHedda MeadanMollie V. BlackburnJames W. Halle
- Topics
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (8 papers)Tactile and Sensory Interactions (7 papers)Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (6 papers)
- Journals
- Brain InjuryJournal of Developmental and Physical DisabilitiesJournal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stacy M. Kelly
25 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Cognitive Neuroscience 96
- Occupational Therapy 93
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 91
- Safety Research 90
- Sociology and Political Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Stacy M. Kelly
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy M. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy M. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy M. Kelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy M. Kelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy M. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy M. Kelly. The network helps show where Stacy M. Kelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy M. Kelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy M. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy M. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy M. Kelly. Stacy M. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | A Research Agenda for Assistive Technology Used by Students with Visual Impairments | 1 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 59 | |
| 20 | Correlates of assistive technology use by students who are visually impaired in the U.S.: Multilevel modeling of the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study | 3 |
About Stacy M. Kelly
Stacy M. Kelly is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Occupational Therapy and Transportation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (7 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (91 citations), Occupational Therapy (93 citations) and Safety Research (90 citations). Stacy M. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Karen E. Wolffe, Derrick W. Smith, Gaylen Kapperman, Thomas J. Smith, Paul M. Ajuwon, Hedda Meadan, Mollie V. Blackburn, James W. Halle, Mary P. Galea and Beverley Eldridge. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Injury, Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities and Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.