Countries citing papers authored by Siobhan Austen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Siobhan Austen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Siobhan Austen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Siobhan Austen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Siobhan Austen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Siobhan Austen. The network helps show where Siobhan Austen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Siobhan Austen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Siobhan Austen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Siobhan Austen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Siobhan Austen. Siobhan Austen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jefferson, Therese & Siobhan Austen. (2015). Understanding links between gender and pay: An important role for heterodox economics. Journal of Australian political economy. 75(75). 115–129.5 indexed citations
5.
Jefferson, Therese & Siobhan Austen. (2015). Understanding links between gender and pay. Journal of Australian political economy. 115.1 indexed citations
6.
Austen, Siobhan & Rachel Ong. (2015). The use of home equity to fund the consumption needs of retirees: a selective review of literature on issues and potential risks. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
Austen, Siobhan. (2008). Australia's research quality framework and gender equity. eSpace (Curtin University). 9(1). 31–40.3 indexed citations
12.
Austen, Siobhan. (2008). The Labour Force Involvement of Women: Lessons from a Comparison of Canada and Australia. 3(2). 125.1 indexed citations
13.
Sharp, Rhonda & Siobhan Austen. (2007). The 2006 Federal Budget: A Gender Analysis of the Superannuation Taxation Concessions. Australian journal of labour economics. 10(2). 61–77.8 indexed citations
14.
Austen, Siobhan, et al.. (2006). The Evolution of the Female Labour Force Participation Rate in Australia, 1984-1999. eSpace (Curtin University). 9(3). 305–320.7 indexed citations
15.
Austen, Siobhan & Elisa Birch. (2005). The determinants of labour force participation for older Australian women: A literature review. eSpace (Curtin University). 44.5 indexed citations
16.
Austen, Siobhan. (2004). Gender Differences in Academic Rank in Australian Universities. eSpace (Curtin University). 30(2). 113–133.9 indexed citations
17.
Austen, Siobhan. (2003). Gender Differences in the Likelihood of Low Pay in Australia. Australian journal of labour economics. 6(1). 153–176.2 indexed citations
18.
Austen, Siobhan & Margaret Giles. (2003). The Likely Effects of Ageing on Women's Involvement in the Paid Workforce. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 29(3). 253–273.6 indexed citations
19.
Preston, Alison & Siobhan Austen. (2001). Women, superannuation and the SGC [Superannuation Guarantee Charge] [The results reported in this paper derive from a larger report (Austen, Jefferson and Preston 2001) prepared for the West Australian Women's Policy Office. q]. Australian bulletin of labour. 27(4). 272.11 indexed citations
20.
Preston, Alison & Siobhan Austen. (2001). Women, superannuation and the SGC.. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 14(4). 272–295.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.