This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Lewin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Lewin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Lewin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Lewin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Lewin. The network helps show where Gill Lewin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Lewin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Lewin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Lewin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Lewin. Gill Lewin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boldy, Duncan, et al.. (2013). Ageing in Place in Rural Areas of Western Australia: Actions, Choices and Preferences. eSpace (Curtin University). 8(1). 117–124.8 indexed citations
Miller, Charne, Leila Karimi, Suzanne Kapp, et al.. (2010). Client perceptions of two types of antimicrobial dressings and compression bandaging. eSpace (Curtin University). 18(3). 124–132.3 indexed citations
10.
Santamaria, Nick, Keryln Carville, Jenny Prentice, et al.. (2009). Reducing pressure ulcer prevalence in residential aged care: results from phase II of the PRIME trial. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).8 indexed citations
11.
Newall, Nelly, et al.. (2009). Nurses' Experiences of Participating in a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) in the Community. eSpace (Curtin University). 17(1). 24–34.7 indexed citations
12.
Lewin, Gill, et al.. (2008). The Home Independence Project. eSpace (Curtin University). 26(3). 13–20.12 indexed citations
13.
Flowers, Chris I., Nelly Newall, Suzanne Kapp, et al.. (2008). Clinician Inter-rater Reliability Using a Medical Wound Imaging System. eSpace (Curtin University). 16(1). 22–31.11 indexed citations
14.
Carville, Keryln, et al.. (2007). STAR: A Consensus for Skin Tear Classification. eSpace (Curtin University). 15(1). 18–28.71 indexed citations
15.
Kapp, Suzanne, et al.. (2007). The Angior Trial: Community Nurse Perceptions of Wound Best Practice Initiatives. 15(4). 149.1 indexed citations
16.
Ellis, Isabelle, Nick Santamaria, Keryln Carville, et al.. (2006). Improving pressure ulcer management in Australian nursing homes: results of the PRIME Trial organisational study. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 14(3). 106–111.8 indexed citations
17.
Santamaria, Nick, Keryln Carville, Jenny Prentice, et al.. (2005). Pressure ulcer prevalence and its relationship to comorbidity in nursing home residents: results from phase 1 of the PRIME Trial. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).8 indexed citations
Lewin, Gill, et al.. (2003). Determining the effectiveness of implementing the AWMA 'Guidelines for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers' in Silver Chain, a Large Home Care Agency Stage 1: Baseline Measurement. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 11(2). 57–72.9 indexed citations
20.
Prentice, Jenny, Michael Stacey, & Gill Lewin. (2003). An Australian model for conducting pressure ulcer prevalence surveys. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 11(2). 87–109.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.