The Economic and Labour Relations Review

754 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 754 papers published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review usually cover Public Administration (255 papers), Sociology and Political Science (249 papers) and General Health Professions (235 papers) specifically the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (253 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (222 papers) and Digital Economy and Work Transformation (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Economic and Labour Relations Review are Jim Stanford, Michael Quinlan, Andrew Stewart, Wayne Lewchuk, Iain Campbell, Stephen Clibborn, Chris F. Wright, Robin Price, Peter Saunders and Piotr Żuk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Economic and Labour Relations Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Economic and Labour Relations Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Economic and Labour Relations Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025