Sheila Fling

552 total citations
9 papers, 401 citations indexed

About

Sheila Fling is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sheila Fling has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 401 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Education and 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sheila Fling's work include Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers). Sheila Fling is often cited by papers focused on Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers). Sheila Fling collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Sheila Fling's co-authors include Martin Manosevitz, Mitsuru Wakabayashi, Atsuko Kanai, Shirley Miller Rosenwasser, Leigh K. Smith, Harvey J. Ginsburg, Norman M. Prentice and Michael P. Gallaher and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Sheila Fling

9 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sheila Fling United States	7	189	115	114	68	66	9	401
Nuran Hortaçsu Türkiye	13	218 1.2×	59 0.5×	220 1.9×	77 1.1×	127 1.9×	36	503
John P. McKee United States	9	93 0.5×	228 2.0×	148 1.3×	55 0.8×	79 1.2×	24	492
Diane M. Badzinski United States	9	116 0.6×	37 0.3×	112 1.0×	66 1.0×	118 1.8×	23	360
Jim Duffy Canada	8	92 0.5×	114 1.0×	100 0.9×	121 1.8×	77 1.2×	11	350
B. Corenblum Canada	13	174 0.9×	46 0.4×	281 2.5×	105 1.5×	68 1.0×	28	478
Thomas R. Cain United States	6	111 0.6×	28 0.2×	117 1.0×	74 1.1×	43 0.7×	8	263
Jennie Lee–Kim United States	7	252 1.3×	58 0.5×	399 3.5×	151 2.2×	75 1.1×	13	534
Rusty B. McIntyre United States	8	183 1.0×	152 1.3×	263 2.3×	73 1.1×	34 0.5×	11	461
Diether Hopf Germany	10	130 0.7×	42 0.4×	90 0.8×	309 4.5×	114 1.7×	21	523
J. C. Dixon United States	6	76 0.4×	27 0.2×	256 2.2×	30 0.4×	56 0.8×	12	470

Countries citing papers authored by Sheila Fling

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheila Fling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheila Fling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheila Fling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheila Fling

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheila Fling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheila Fling. The network helps show where Sheila Fling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheila Fling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheila Fling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheila Fling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sheila Fling. Sheila Fling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Kanai, Atsuko, Mitsuru Wakabayashi, & Sheila Fling. (1996). Workaholism among employees in Japanese corporations: An examination based on the Japanese version of the Workaholism Scales. Japanese Psychological Research. 38(4). 192–203. 114 indexed citations

2.

Fling, Sheila, et al.. (1992). VIDEOGAMES, AGGRESSION, AND SELF-ESTEEM: A SURVEY. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal. 20(1). 39–45. 61 indexed citations

3.

Rosenwasser, Shirley Miller, et al.. (1987). Attitudes toward Women and Men in Politics: Perceived Male and Female Candidate Competencies and Participant Personality Characteristics. Political Psychology. 8(2). 191–191. 59 indexed citations

4.

Fling, Sheila, et al.. (1986). Relaxation Covert Rehearsal for Adaptive Functioning in Fourth-Grade Children. 1(2). 113–125. 3 indexed citations

5.

Fling, Sheila, et al.. (1981). Participant characteristics and the effects of two types of meditation vs. quiet sitting. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 37(4). 784–790. 9 indexed citations

6.

Ginsburg, Harvey J., et al.. (1979). Maternal Holding Preferences: A Consequence of Newborn Head-Turning Response. Child Development. 50(1). 280–280. 44 indexed citations

7.

Fling, Sheila, et al.. (1977). IMAGINARY COMPANIONS IN YOUNG CHILDREN: RELATIONSHIPS WITH INTELLIGENCE, CREATIVITY AND WAITING ABILITY*. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 18(1). 73–78. 25 indexed citations

8.

Manosevitz, Martin & Sheila Fling. (1975). The Relationship of Imaginary Companions in Young Children to Intelligence, Creativity, and Waiting Ability.. 1 indexed citations

9.

Fling, Sheila & Martin Manosevitz. (1972). Sex typing in nursery school children's play interests.. Developmental Psychology. 7(2). 146–152. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact