G.E. Gorman
- Information Systems top 2%
- Library and Information Sciences top 0.5%
- Education top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Peter ClaytonKanwal AmeenDavid J. PauleenKlaus AltmannPhilip CalvertBrian CorbittMd Jan NordinJennifer Rowley
- Topics
- Library Science and Information Literacy (23 papers)Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (22 papers)Web and Library Services (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G.E. Gorman
79 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Information Systems 284
- Library and Information Sciences 195
- Education 103
- Communication 101
- Sociology and Political Science 89
Countries citing papers authored by G.E. Gorman
This map shows the geographic impact of G.E. Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.E. Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.E. Gorman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.E. Gorman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.E. Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.E. Gorman. The network helps show where G.E. Gorman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.E. Gorman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.E. Gorman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.E. Gorman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.E. Gorman. G.E. Gorman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Metadata applications and management | 4 |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | The digital factor in library and information services | 11 |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | Asian Library Partnerships: Applying the Knowledge Model for Library Networks. | 1 |
| 15 | Collection Management for the 21st Century: A Handbook for Librarians | 21 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Guide to the library | 2 |
About G.E. Gorman
G.E. Gorman is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 94 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (23 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (22 papers) and Web and Library Services (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (195 citations), Communication (101 citations) and Information Systems (284 citations). G.E. Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Clayton, Kanwal Ameen, David J. Pauleen, Klaus Altmann, Philip Calvert, Brian Corbitt, Md Jan Nordin, Jennifer Rowley, Rowena Cullen and Heather Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Knowledge Management, Online Information Review and Roeper Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.