Claire Creaser

1.6k citations
72 papers · 963 indexed · h-index 19

Claire Creaser

68 papers receiving 837 citations

Peers

Claire Creaser
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Library and Information Sciences 112
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 427
  • Information Systems and Management 271
  • History and Philosophy of Science 78
  • Information Systems 357
Replace Jenny Fry with:
Jenny Fry United Kingdom
Blanca Rodríguez Bravo Spain
Chérifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri France
A. N. Zainab Malaysia
Jingfeng Xia United States
Marzena Świgoń Poland
Philip M. Davis United States
Tom Dobrowolski United Kingdom
G.E. Gorman New Zealand
Claire Creaser relative to Jenny Fry United Kingdom Jenny Fry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Jenny Fry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claire Creaser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claire Creaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claire Creaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claire Creaser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claire Creaser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claire Creaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claire Creaser. The network helps show where Claire Creaser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claire Creaser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claire Creaser Line = papers co-authored together Claire Creaser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201918
2 201818
3 201825
4 201719
5 201773
6 201718
7 201739
8 201720
9 201651
10 20164
11 20158
12
PEER behavioural research: authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories. D4.2 final report.
20119
13 20088
14 20055
15 20023
16 200112
17 20010
18
Public Library Services for Visually Impaired People
20007
19 19991
20 19952

About Claire Creaser

Claire Creaser is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (22 papers), Library Science and Administration (21 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (14 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (10 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (8 papers), Web and Library Services (7 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (112 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (427 citations) and Information Systems and Management (271 citations). Claire Creaser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Valérie Spezi, Jenny Fry, Stephen Pinfield, Peter Willett, Simon Wakeling, Charles Oppenheim, Sonya White, Helen Greenwood, Steve Probets and Mark A. Summers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Journal of Documentation, Performance Measurement and Metrics, Learned Publishing and New Review of Academic Librarianship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026