Philip Hider

877 total citations
84 papers, 576 citations indexed

About

Philip Hider is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Hider has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 576 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Information Systems, 35 papers in Library and Information Sciences and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Philip Hider's work include Library Science and Information Literacy (23 papers), Library Science and Administration (23 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (16 papers). Philip Hider is often cited by papers focused on Library Science and Information Literacy (23 papers), Library Science and Administration (23 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (16 papers). Philip Hider collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Philip Hider's co-authors include Ying‐Hsang Liu, Muhammad Asim Qayyum, Hamid R. Jamali, Kirsty Williamson, Simon Wakeling, Jane Garner, Holly Randell‐Moon, Yazdan Mansourian, Mary Anne Kennan and Ross Harvey and has published in prestigious journals such as Higher Education Research & Development, Journal of Documentation and Journal of Information Science.

In The Last Decade

Philip Hider

71 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Hider Australia 13 268 198 97 94 90 84 576
Jody Condit Fagan United States 16 400 1.5× 255 1.3× 85 0.9× 83 0.9× 52 0.6× 60 715
Andrew Asher United States 11 253 0.9× 173 0.9× 30 0.3× 78 0.8× 75 0.8× 37 525
Jillian R. Griffiths United Kingdom 7 196 0.7× 97 0.5× 50 0.5× 84 0.9× 60 0.7× 15 447
R. David Lankes United States 16 497 1.9× 352 1.8× 210 2.2× 128 1.4× 89 1.0× 60 810
Susan Gibbons United Kingdom 13 412 1.5× 198 1.0× 70 0.7× 37 0.4× 69 0.8× 36 718
Snunith Shoham Israel 15 184 0.7× 190 1.0× 128 1.3× 88 0.9× 79 0.9× 62 597
Joseph Janes United States 15 468 1.7× 265 1.3× 119 1.2× 74 0.8× 57 0.6× 41 701
Kathleen Burnett United States 14 188 0.7× 68 0.3× 68 0.7× 87 0.9× 128 1.4× 41 498
David McMenemy United Kingdom 14 196 0.7× 263 1.3× 121 1.2× 196 2.1× 49 0.5× 66 620
Eileen G. Abels United States 15 283 1.1× 177 0.9× 100 1.0× 100 1.1× 39 0.4× 50 603

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Hider

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Hider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Hider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Hider more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Hider

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Hider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Hider. The network helps show where Philip Hider may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Hider

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Hider. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Hider based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Hider. Philip Hider is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wakeling, Simon, et al.. (2025). An Analysis of the Design Characteristics of New Public Library Buildings. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 75(1). 143–179.
2.
Hider, Philip, Simon Wakeling, Hamid R. Jamali, & Jane Garner. (2025). Planning and Using Library Codesign: Towards a Toolkit for Public Libraries. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 75(1). 66–84.
3.
Wakeling, Simon, et al.. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Public Library Codesign Workshop Process. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 75(1). 110–142. 1 indexed citations
4.
Hider, Philip. (2025). Staking a Claim: The Transition of L to LIS Education in Australia. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 74(4). 533–561.
5.
Jamali, Hamid R. & Philip Hider. (2023). Changes in the Usage Pattern of Public Library Collections during the COVID Pandemic. Collection Management. 48(4). 324–338. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hider, Philip, Jane Garner, Simon Wakeling, & Hamid R. Jamali. (2022). Serving Their Communities: An Analysis of Australian Public Library Mission Statements. Journal of Library Administration. 62(2). 190–205. 9 indexed citations
7.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2021). LibraryThing and Literary Works Revisited: Are Social and Library Cataloging Just as Complementary as they were a Decade Ago?. Library Resources and Technical Services. 65(3). 113–113.
8.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2020). How We Talk about the Movies: A Comparison of Australian, British and American Film Genre Terms. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 69(3). 345–356.
9.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2019). Minding the gap: investigating the alignment of information organization research and practice,. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 24(3). 13–24. 3 indexed citations
10.
Hider, Philip. (2019). From Anderson to ORDAC: A History of Bibliographic Policy Discussion in Australia. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 68(1). 3–17. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2018). Narrowing the Gap Between LIS Research and Practice in Australia. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. 67(1). 3–19. 13 indexed citations
12.
Hider, Philip. (2016). A Critique of the FRBR User Tasks and Their Modifications. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 55(2). 55–74. 4 indexed citations
13.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2015). Developing a Schema for Describing the Contents of the Office for Learning and Teaching's Resource Library. Australian Academic & Research Libraries. 46(3). 151–163. 1 indexed citations
14.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2014). Auditing the Office for Learning and Teaching Resource Library. ASCILITE Publications. 663–667.
15.
Partridge, Helen, Hilary Hughes, Mary Carroll, et al.. (2011). Re-conceptualising and re-positioning Australian library and information science education for the 21st century [Final Report 2011]. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 12 indexed citations
16.
Hider, Philip. (2008). Use and Nonuse of an Australian Regional Public Library. Australasian public libraries and information services. 21(1). 33. 3 indexed citations
17.
Hider, Philip, et al.. (2006). The Application of AACR2's Rules for Personal Names in Certain Languages. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 43(2). 37–52. 2 indexed citations
18.
Hider, Philip. (2006). A Survey of Continuing Professional Development Activities and Attitudes Amongst Catalogers. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 42(2). 35–58. 24 indexed citations
19.
Hider, Philip. (2004). LEARNING TO CLASSIFY: ONLINE VERSUS PRINTED DEWEY. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 9(1). 15–25. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hider, Philip. (2004). Australian Digital Collections: Metadata Standards and Interoperability. Australian Academic & Research Libraries. 35(4). 289–300. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026