Stephen Pinfield

4.0k total citations
91 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Stephen Pinfield is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Pinfield has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 35 papers in Information Systems and 34 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Stephen Pinfield's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (36 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (23 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (19 papers). Stephen Pinfield is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (36 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (23 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (19 papers). Stephen Pinfield collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Stephen Pinfield's co-authors include Andrew Cox, Sophie Rutter, Peter A. Bath, Mary Anne Kennan, Liz Lyon, Simon Wakeling, Valérie Spezi, Peter Willett, Jenny Fry and Claire Creaser and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientometrics.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Pinfield

85 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Pinfield United Kingdom 26 1.2k 938 759 397 237 91 2.4k
Abdullah Abrizah Malaysia 25 717 0.6× 390 0.4× 660 0.9× 55 0.1× 76 0.3× 140 2.0k
William H. Walters United States 23 543 0.4× 224 0.2× 394 0.5× 50 0.1× 130 0.5× 75 1.7k
Anthony Watkinson United Kingdom 22 576 0.5× 366 0.4× 636 0.8× 48 0.1× 74 0.3× 61 1.6k
Philip M. Davis United States 20 758 0.6× 325 0.3× 740 1.0× 30 0.1× 66 0.3× 38 1.6k
Isabella Peters Germany 19 560 0.5× 274 0.3× 666 0.9× 60 0.2× 308 1.3× 71 1.6k
Péter Jacsó United States 23 740 0.6× 214 0.2× 979 1.3× 57 0.1× 156 0.7× 90 1.9k
Besiki Stvilia United States 21 738 0.6× 248 0.3× 79 0.1× 378 1.0× 333 1.4× 72 1.7k
José Luís Ortega Spain 23 809 0.7× 152 0.2× 773 1.0× 53 0.1× 94 0.4× 89 1.9k
Liwen Vaughan Canada 28 1.5k 1.2× 118 0.1× 741 1.0× 58 0.1× 179 0.8× 82 2.4k
Kiran Kaur Malaysia 17 310 0.2× 460 0.5× 94 0.1× 38 0.1× 161 0.7× 70 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pinfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pinfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pinfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pinfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pinfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pinfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pinfield. The network helps show where Stephen Pinfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Pinfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Pinfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Pinfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Pinfield. Stephen Pinfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alperín, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2025). Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies?. Journal of Documentation. 81(4). 847–869. 1 indexed citations
2.
Alperín, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2025). Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas. Royal Society Open Science. 12(4). 240857–240857.
3.
Pinfield, Stephen, et al.. (2024). Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research. F1000Research. 12. 512–512. 4 indexed citations
4.
Pinfield, Stephen, Pamela Abbott, Andrew Cox, et al.. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: a qualitative analysis of published materials from the period of the pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Pinfield, Stephen, et al.. (2023). Pandemia trouxe oportunidades para mais inclusão na ciência. RDBCI Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação. 21.
6.
Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, et al.. (2022). Innovating peer review, reconfiguring scholarly communication: an analytical overview of ongoing peer review innovation activities. Journal of Documentation. 78(7). 429–449. 15 indexed citations
7.
Woods, Helen Buckley & Stephen Pinfield. (2021). Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 355–355. 7 indexed citations
8.
Pinfield, Stephen, Simon Wakeling, David Bawden, & Lyn Robinson. (2020). Open access in theory and practice : the theory-practice relationship and openness. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 9 indexed citations
9.
Cox, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Progress in Research Data Services. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(1). 126–135. 12 indexed citations
10.
Wakeling, Simon, Claire Creaser, Stephen Pinfield, et al.. (2019). Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(7). 754–768. 18 indexed citations
11.
Chiarelli, Andrea, et al.. (2019). Practices, drivers and impediments in the use of preprints (Phase 1 report). Figshare. 1 indexed citations
13.
Cox, Andrew, Stephen Pinfield, & Sophie Rutter. (2018). The intelligent library. Library Hi Tech. 37(3). 418–435. 154 indexed citations
14.
Cox, Andrew, Stephen Pinfield, & Sophie Rutter. (2018). Extending McKinsey’s 7S model to understand strategic alignment in academic libraries. Library Management. 40(5). 313–326. 18 indexed citations
15.
Wakeling, Simon, Valérie Spezi, Claire Creaser, et al.. (2017). Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities). Learned Publishing. 30(4). 313–322. 19 indexed citations
16.
Spezi, Valérie, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, et al.. (2017). Open-access mega-journals. Journal of Documentation. 73(2). 263–283. 73 indexed citations
17.
Wakeling, Simon, Valérie Spezi, Jenny Fry, et al.. (2017). Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations). Learned Publishing. 30(4). 301–311. 18 indexed citations
18.
Spezi, Valérie, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, et al.. (2017). “Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals. Journal of Documentation. 74(1). 137–161. 39 indexed citations
19.
Pinfield, Stephen. (2009). Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship?. Learned Publishing. 22(3). 165–175. 31 indexed citations
20.
maccoll, john, et al.. (2002). Setting up an Institutional E-Print Archive. Ariadne. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026