Scott W. Bagley
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Michael C. WillisRobert G. BergmanVincent MascittiF. Dean TosteMiles W. JohnsonNeal P. MankadJohn M. CurtoAlyn T. Davies
- Topics
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (7 papers)Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (5 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Scott W. Bagley
24 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Organic Chemistry 917
- Pharmaceutical Science 184
- Molecular Biology 178
- Inorganic Chemistry 57
- Physiology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Scott W. Bagley
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott W. Bagley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott W. Bagley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott W. Bagley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott W. Bagley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott W. Bagley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott W. Bagley. The network helps show where Scott W. Bagley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott W. Bagley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott W. Bagley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott W. Bagley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott W. Bagley. Scott W. Bagley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | Decarboxylative cross-nucleophile coupling via ligand-to-metal charge transfer photoexcitation of Cu(ii) carboxylatesbreakdown → | 166 |
| 7 | 97 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 191 | |
| 11 | 233 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Scott W. Bagley
Scott W. Bagley is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (7 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (5 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (917 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (184 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (12 citations). Scott W. Bagley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Willis, Robert G. Bergman, Vincent Mascitti, F. Dean Toste, Miles W. Johnson, Neal P. Mankad, John M. Curto, Alyn T. Davies, Terry Shing‐Bong Lou and Samuel N. Gockel. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Chemistry and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.