Algebra and Number Theory

14.5k papers receiving 45.5k citations

Countries where authors publish papers about Algebra and Number Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Algebra and Number Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Algebra and Number Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Algebra and Number Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers about Algebra and Number Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Algebra and Number Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Algebra and Number Theory.

About Algebra and Number Theory

216.2k papers covering Algebra and Number Theory have received a total of 2.3M indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Algebra and Number Theory are most often about the specific topic of Advanced Topics in Algebra, Algebraic structures and combinatorial models and Rings, Modules, and Algebras and also cover the fields of Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Mathematical Physics. Papers citing work on Algebra and Number Theory are usually about Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Mathematical Physics. Some of the most active scholars covering Algebra and Number Theory are Victor G. Kač, George E. Andrews, Joseph H. Silverman, Richard P. Stanley, Jean-Pierre Serre, Bruce C. Berndt, Michio Jimbo, H. M. Srivastava, Hyman Bass and Alexandre Grothendieck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026