Scott Jacobs

43 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Scott Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Language and Linguistics 573
  • Literature and Literary Theory 435
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 434
  • Communication 194
  • Structural Biology 33
Replace W. Barnett Pearce with:
W. Barnett Pearce United States
Donald G. Ellis United States
Rob Grootendorst Netherlands
Justus Buchler United States
Ruth Page United Kingdom
Albert Séchehaye
Roderick P. Hart United States
Gary Saul Morson United States
Andrea A. Lunsford United States
Sarah Mercer Austria
Scott Jacobs relative to W. Barnett Pearce United States W. Barnett Pearce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
W. Barnett Pearce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Jacobs. The network helps show where Scott Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Scott Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse
1993299
2 1980220
3 1983216
4 200284
5 200072
6 198363
7 198960
8 198960
9 198159
10 201259
11 198851
12 199739
13 200235
14 199234
15 200232
16 199626
17 198122
18 199021
19 200720
20 198218

About Scott Jacobs

Scott Jacobs is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (22 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (17 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (12 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (3 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (573 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (435 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (434 citations), Communication (194 citations) and Structural Biology (33 citations). Scott Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and British Virgin Islands. Frequent co-authors include Sally Jackson, Rob Grootendorst, Frans H. van Eemeren, Mark Aakhus, Daniel J. O’Keefe, Dale E. Brashers, Shuang Zhang, Lina W. Chang, Kirk J. Czymmek and Jeffrey L. Caplan. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Monographs, Argumentation, Annals of the International Communication Association, Informal Logic and Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact