Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
About
In The Last Decade
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
13.3k papers receiving 418.8k citations
Fields of papers published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
Countries where authors publish in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry more than expected).
- Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects (2008)
- Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment (2009)
- Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research (2020)
- Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen (1996)
- Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning (1991)
- Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical Basis (2001)
- BIOTIC LIGAND MODEL OF THE ACUTE TOXICITY OF METALS. 1. TECHNICAL BASIS (2001)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.