Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Rob Grootendorst
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Grootendorst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Grootendorst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Grootendorst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Grootendorst
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Grootendorst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Grootendorst. The network helps show where Rob Grootendorst may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Grootendorst
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Grootendorst.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Grootendorst based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Grootendorst. Rob Grootendorst is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck, Frans H. van Eemeren, & Rob Grootendorst. (2003). Indicators of argumentation structures.1 indexed citations
2.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1999). The fallacies of composition and division.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).7 indexed citations
3.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1996). Argument ad hominem. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 5(8). 35–35.
4.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, et al.. (1996). Argumenteren voor juristen: Het analyseren en schrijven van juridische betogen en beleidsteksten.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
5.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1995). Perelman and the Fallacies. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 28(2). 122–133.18 indexed citations
6.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, et al.. (1995). Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, II. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Eemeren, Frans H. van, et al.. (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).299 indexed citations
9.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1993). The pragma-dialectical approach to fallacies. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1. 130–144.15 indexed citations
10.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1992). Editors' introduction. Argumentation. 6(2). 137–139.1 indexed citations
11.
Krabbe, Erik C. W., et al.. (1991). Subtypes of Persuasion Dialogue and Dialectical Shifts. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
12.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, & Charles Arthur Willard. (1990). Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline, Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation 1986. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 23(1).11 indexed citations
13.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1989). A pragma-dialectical perspective on norms.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
Waaldijk, C., et al.. (1987). Can we Require Legislatures to State the Reasons for their Legislative Decisions?. Leiden Repository (Leiden University).1 indexed citations
17.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, et al.. (1987). Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).69 indexed citations
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1983). Unexpressed Premisses: Part II. Argumentation and Advocacy. 19(4). 215–225.11 indexed citations
20.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst. (1974). Object en doelstelling van taalbeheersing.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 3(6). 413–432.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.