Communication Monographs

1.2k papers and 64.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Communication Monographs in the last decades have received a total of 64.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Communication Monographs usually cover Social Psychology (519 papers), Sociology and Political Science (472 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (235 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (203 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (173 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (162 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Communication Monographs are Andrew F. Hayes, Kim Witte, Walter R. Fisher, Judee K. Burgoon, James Price Dillard, James C. McCroskey, Eric M. Eisenberg, Jerold L. Hale, Timothy R. Levine and Lijiang Shen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Communication Monographs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Communication Monographs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Communication Monographs.

Countries where authors publish in Communication Monographs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Communication Monographs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Communication Monographs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Communication Monographs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025