Scott Fricker

782 citations
15 papers · 509 indexed · h-index 9

Scott Fricker

13 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Scott Fricker
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Statistics and Probability 61
  • Sociology and Political Science 319
  • Communication 45
  • Information Systems and Management 41
  • Computer Science Applications 24
Replace Tobias Gummer with:
Tobias Gummer Germany
Joss Roßmann Germany
M. P. Couper United States
George Terhanian Slovakia
Dirk Heerwegh Belgium
Lars Kaczmirek Germany
John Bremer United States
Dorothée Behr Germany
Wolfgang Bandilla Germany
Linda Piekarski United States
Scott Fricker relative to Tobias Gummer Germany Tobias Gummer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Tobias Gummer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Fricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Fricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Fricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Fricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Fricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Fricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Fricker. The network helps show where Scott Fricker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Scott Fricker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Fricker Line = papers co-authored together Scott Fricker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20175
2 20164
3 20151
4 20155
5 20159
6
Development of a Quality Framework and Quality Indicators at the Bureau of Labor Statistics
20141
7
An exploration of the application of PLS path modeling approach to creating a summary index of respondent burden
20126
8 201050
9
Seam effects in quantitative responses
20098
10
Everyday concepts and classification errors: judgments of disability and residence
20068
11 2005298
12 200457
13 200323
14 199525
15 19949

About Scott Fricker

Scott Fricker is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (9 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper) and Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (61 citations), Sociology and Political Science (319 citations) and Communication (45 citations). Scott Fricker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Frederick G. Conrad, Roger Tourangeau, Michael F. Schober, Lance J. Rips, Robert A. Giacalone, Jon W. Beard, Stanley B. Klein, Judith Loftus, Christoph Thüemmler and Michael Horrigan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Public Opinion Quarterly and Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026