John Bremer

776 total citations
11 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

John Bremer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, John Bremer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Statistics and Probability and 2 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in John Bremer's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (3 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers). John Bremer is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (3 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers). John Bremer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Belgium. John Bremer's co-authors include George Terhanian, Bobby Duffy, Kate Smith, Richard G. Niemi, Hugh R. Taylor, André Danthine, P.V. Harrison, Ian Bennett and John Nisbet and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advertising Research, Political Behavior and European Journal of Education.

In The Last Decade

John Bremer

11 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Bremer United States	7	260	71	69	65	60	11	545
George Terhanian Slovakia	5	260 1.0×	80 1.1×	74 1.1×	57 0.9×	60 1.0×	8	567
Martin Collins Bangladesh	6	239 0.9×	43 0.6×	30 0.4×	49 0.8×	49 0.8×	13	456
M. P. Couper United States	6	289 1.1×	29 0.4×	47 0.7×	66 1.0×	68 1.1×	6	542
Michael J. Swenson United States	10	130 0.5×	56 0.8×	80 1.2×	60 0.9×	50 0.8×	26	598
Dirk Heerwegh Belgium	4	373 1.4×	21 0.3×	64 0.9×	71 1.1×	50 0.8×	7	575
Mike Brennan New Zealand	15	251 1.0×	142 2.0×	128 1.9×	110 1.7×	34 0.6×	37	550
Lars Kaczmirek Germany	14	397 1.5×	22 0.3×	40 0.6×	44 0.7×	49 0.8×	28	635
Scott Fricker United States	9	319 1.2×	19 0.3×	33 0.5×	81 1.2×	35 0.6×	15	509
Jong-Hoon Kim United States	7	377 1.4×	36 0.5×	113 1.6×	108 1.7×	34 0.6×	20	577
Peter V. Miller United States	9	326 1.3×	18 0.3×	28 0.4×	74 1.1×	34 0.6×	20	576

Countries citing papers authored by John Bremer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bremer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bremer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bremer. The network helps show where John Bremer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Bremer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Bremer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Bremer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Bremer. John Bremer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Terhanian, George, et al.. (2016). A Process for Developing an Optimal Model For Reducing Bias in Nonprobability Samples. Journal of Advertising Research. 56(1). 14–24. 17 indexed citations

2.

Bremer, John, et al.. (2013). The Interaction of Sampling and Weighting In Producing a Representative Sample Online. Journal of Advertising Research. 53(4). 363–371. 4 indexed citations

3.

Terhanian, George & John Bremer. (2012). A Smarter Way to Select Respondents for Surveys?. International Journal of Market Research. 54(6). 751–780. 26 indexed citations

4.

Duffy, Bobby, Kate Smith, George Terhanian, & John Bremer. (2005). Comparing Data from Online and Face-to-face Surveys. International Journal of Market Research. 47(6). 615–639. 396 indexed citations

5.

Terhanian, George, et al.. (2001). The Record of Internet-Based Opinion Polls in Predicting the Results of 72 Races in the November 2000 US Elections. International Journal of Market Research. 43(2). 1–10. 46 indexed citations

6.

Niemi, Richard G., et al.. (1999). Determinants of State Economic Perceptions. Political Behavior. 21(2). 175–193. 28 indexed citations

7.

Harrison, P.V., et al.. (1993). Using bracketed parses to evaluate a grammar checking application. 38–45. 8 indexed citations

8.

Nisbet, John, et al.. (1981). 1980 Plus: Community, Participation and Learning. European Journal of Education. 16(3/4). 441–441. 1 indexed citations

9.

Danthine, André & John Bremer. (1978). Modelling and verification of end-to-end transport protocols. Computer Networks (1976). 2(4-5). 381–395. 13 indexed citations

10.

Bremer, John, et al.. (1972). Open education: a beginning. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 1 indexed citations

11.

Bremer, John, et al.. (1971). The school without walls, Philadelphia's Parkway Program. 10(3). 193–205. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact