Frederick G. Conrad

6.1k total citations
118 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

Frederick G. Conrad is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick G. Conrad has authored 118 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 23 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 14 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Frederick G. Conrad's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (63 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (20 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers). Frederick G. Conrad is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (63 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (20 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers). Frederick G. Conrad collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Norway. Frederick G. Conrad's co-authors include Mick P. Couper, Roger Tourangeau, Michael F. Schober, Chan Zhang, Eleanor Singer, John R. Anderson, Albert T. Corbett, Johnny Blair, Christopher Antoun and Lance J. Rips and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Review.

In The Last Decade

Frederick G. Conrad

117 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick G. Conrad United States 34 1.9k 475 392 353 342 118 4.0k
Ulf‐Dietrich Reips Germany 32 2.5k 1.3× 526 1.1× 758 1.9× 264 0.7× 225 0.7× 133 5.6k
Eyal Peer Israel 13 1.9k 1.0× 330 0.7× 983 2.5× 215 0.6× 295 0.9× 26 4.6k
Tara S. Behrend United States 24 1.1k 0.6× 264 0.6× 689 1.8× 212 0.6× 254 0.7× 68 3.4k
Catherine Marshall United States 32 1.6k 0.8× 203 0.4× 585 1.5× 458 1.3× 122 0.4× 138 5.8k
Lawrence M. Rudner United States 18 877 0.5× 316 0.7× 689 1.8× 351 1.0× 120 0.4× 79 4.7k
Gabriele Paolacci Netherlands 15 2.9k 1.5× 544 1.1× 1.4k 3.6× 258 0.7× 757 2.2× 34 7.2k
Mirta Galešić Germany 39 1.9k 1.0× 380 0.8× 485 1.2× 1.2k 3.5× 106 0.3× 95 5.8k
Michael Bošnjak Germany 35 2.8k 1.5× 145 0.3× 742 1.9× 482 1.4× 183 0.5× 158 5.6k
Leslie K. John United States 23 1.5k 0.8× 372 0.8× 415 1.1× 537 1.5× 90 0.3× 72 4.7k
Kim Bartel Sheehan United States 27 2.4k 1.3× 277 0.6× 436 1.1× 279 0.8× 137 0.4× 62 4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick G. Conrad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick G. Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick G. Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick G. Conrad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick G. Conrad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick G. Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick G. Conrad. The network helps show where Frederick G. Conrad may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick G. Conrad

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick G. Conrad. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick G. Conrad based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick G. Conrad. Frederick G. Conrad is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schober, Michael F., et al.. (2023). Predictors of willingness to participate in survey interviews conducted by live video.. 4(2). 215–229. 1 indexed citations
2.
West, Brady T., et al.. (2021). Interviewer Effects in Live Video and Prerecorded Video Interviewing. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 10(2). 317–336. 8 indexed citations
3.
Schober, Michael F., Josh Pasek, Lauren Guggenheim, Cliff Lampe, & Frederick G. Conrad. (2016). Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly. 80(1). 180–211. 117 indexed citations
4.
Schober, Michael F., Frederick G. Conrad, Christopher Antoun, et al.. (2015). Precision and Disclosure in Text and Voice Interviews on Smartphones. PLoS ONE. 10(6). e0128337–e0128337. 74 indexed citations
5.
Johnston, Michael, Patrick Ehlen, Frederick G. Conrad, et al.. (2013). Spoken Dialog Systems for Automated Survey Interviewing. Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 329–333. 10 indexed citations
6.
Freedman, Vicki A., et al.. (2013). Interviewer and respondent interactions and quality assessments in a time diary study. PubMed. 10(1). 55–75. 5 indexed citations
7.
Freedman, Vicki A., Frederick G. Conrad, Jennifer C. Cornman, Norbert Schwarz, & Frank P. Stafford. (2013). Does Time Fly When You are Having Fun? A Day Reconstruction Method Analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies. 15(3). 639–655. 10 indexed citations
8.
Freedman, Vicki A., et al.. (2012). Assessing Time Diary Quality for Older Couples: An Analysis of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics' Disability and Use of Time (DUST) Supplement.. PubMed Central. 13 indexed citations
9.
Schober, Michael F., Frederick G. Conrad, Wil Dijkstra, & Yfke Ongena. (2012). Disfluencies and Gaze Aversion in Unreliable Responses to Survey Questions. Journal of Official Statistics. 28(4). 555–582. 23 indexed citations
10.
Couper, Mick P., Eleanor Singer, Frederick G. Conrad, & Robert M. Groves. (2011). Experimental studies of disclosure risk, disclosure harm, topic sensitivity and survey participation. Quality Engineering. 56(1). 55–56. 18 indexed citations
11.
Freedman, Vicki A., Frank P. Stafford, Norbert Schwarz, Frederick G. Conrad, & Jennifer C. Cornman. (2011). Disability, participation, and subjective wellbeing among older couples. Social Science & Medicine. 74(4). 588–596. 60 indexed citations
12.
Conrad, Frederick G., Lance J. Rips, & Scott Fricker. (2009). Seam effects in quantitative responses. Journal of Official Statistics. 25(3). 339–361. 8 indexed citations
13.
Conrad, Frederick G.. (2007). Interactive Features of Web Surveys.. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 20(1). 10–17. 4 indexed citations
14.
Herrnson, Paul S., Richard G. Niemi, Michael J. Hanmer, et al.. (2006). The importance of usability testing of voting systems. 3–3. 13 indexed citations
15.
Tourangeau, Roger, et al.. (2006). Everyday concepts and classification errors: judgments of disability and residence. Journal of Official Statistics. 22(3). 385–418. 8 indexed citations
16.
Conrad, Frederick G., Mick P. Couper, Roger Tourangeau, & Andy Peytchev. (2006). Use and non-use of clarification features in web surveys. Journal of Official Statistics. 22(2). 245–269. 27 indexed citations
17.
Schober, Michael F. & Frederick G. Conrad. (2005). Promoting Uniform Question Understanding in Today's and Tomorrow's Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics. 21(2). 215. 8 indexed citations
18.
Conrad, Frederick G., et al.. (2003). Estimating the frequency of events from unnatural categories. Memory & Cognition. 31(4). 552–562. 14 indexed citations
19.
Schober, Michael F., Frederick G. Conrad, & Jonathan Bloom. (2000). Clarifying Word Meanings in Computer-Administered Survey Interviews. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 22(22). 3 indexed citations
20.
Conrad, Frederick G. & Michael F. Schober. (2000). Clarifying Question Meaning in a Household Telephone Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly. 64(1). 1–28. 114 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026