Scott Barnes

31 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Scott Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Language and Linguistics 198
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 97
  • Occupational Therapy 27
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 81
Replace Lisa Perkins with:
Lisa Perkins United Kingdom
Gloria Streit Olness United States
Sarah Lock United Kingdom
Dana Kovarsky United States
Firle Beckley United Kingdom
Phyllis Schneider Canada
Larry Boles United States
Carolyn Bruce United Kingdom
Connie Summers United States
Henriette W. Langdon United States
Scott Barnes relative to Lisa Perkins United Kingdom Lisa Perkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Lisa Perkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Barnes. The network helps show where Scott Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Scott Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Barnes Line = papers co-authored together Scott Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 201432
3 200930
4 201220
5 201917
6 202013
7 202013
8 201213
9 201712
10 201112
11 201512
12 201911
13 201410
14 201210
15 20209
16 20198
17 20208
18 20208
19 20128
20 20167

About Scott Barnes

Scott Barnes is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (29 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (13 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (198 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (97 citations), Occupational Therapy (27 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (81 citations). Scott Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Ferguson, Steven Bloch, Niels Buus, Ben Ong, Elizabeth Armstrong, Lyndsey Nickels, Christopher N. Candlin, Leanne Togher, Emma Power and Suzanne Beeke. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, Journal of Pragmatics, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Research on Language and Social Interaction and Family Process.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact