Sasha Costanza‐Chock
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lynn DombrowskiSheena EreteChristina HarringtonMariam AsadRicarose RoqueSayamindu DasguptaMelissa BroughSuzanne Kite
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (6 papers)Digital Games and Media (2 papers)ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Sasha Costanza‐Chock
19 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Sociology and Political Science 215
- Communication 148
- Human-Computer Interaction 106
- Safety Research 79
- Gender Studies 64
Countries citing papers authored by Sasha Costanza‐Chock
This map shows the geographic impact of Sasha Costanza‐Chock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sasha Costanza‐Chock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sasha Costanza‐Chock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sasha Costanza‐Chock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sasha Costanza‐Chock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sasha Costanza‐Chock. The network helps show where Sasha Costanza‐Chock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sasha Costanza‐Chock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sasha Costanza‐Chock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sasha Costanza‐Chock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sasha Costanza‐Chock. Sasha Costanza‐Chock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | The Oracle for Transfeminist Technologies | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 140 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 70 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | PageOneX: New Approaches to Newspaper Front Page Analysis | 2 |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | Chapter 5: Transmedia Mobilization in the Popular Association of the Oaxacan Peoples, Los Angeles | 4 |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 112 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | Mobile Voices: projecting the voices of immigrant workers by appropriating mobile phones for popular communication | 3 |
| 20 | 15 |
About Sasha Costanza‐Chock
Sasha Costanza‐Chock is a scholar working on Communication, Business and International Management and Computer Science Applications, having authored 20 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (148 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (106 citations) and Safety Research (79 citations). Sasha Costanza‐Chock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynn Dombrowski, Sheena Erete, Christina Harrington, Mariam Asad, Ricarose Roque, Sayamindu Dasgupta, Melissa Brough, Suzanne Kite, Noelani Arista and Kristin Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Media Culture & Society, American Quarterly and Social movement studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.