Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication
2016161 citationsNatasha N. Jones, Kristen Moore et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Walton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Walton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Walton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Walton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Walton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Walton. The network helps show where Rebecca Walton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Walton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Walton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Walton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Walton. Rebecca Walton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walton, Rebecca, Kristen Moore, & Natasha N. Jones. (2019). Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action.35 indexed citations
5.
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2018). Bridging Analysis and Action. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 32(4). 416–446.27 indexed citations
Rose, Emma & Rebecca Walton. (2015). Factors to actors. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 1–10.20 indexed citations
10.
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2014). Methodological journey: Lessons learned from a student-led intercultural pilot study. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 5(1). 90–107.4 indexed citations
11.
Walton, Rebecca. (2014). Editor's introduction to special edition on intercultural methodology. 5(1). 1–13.1 indexed citations
12.
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2013). Emerging Trends Toward Holistic Disaster Preparedness. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 764–769.3 indexed citations
13.
Walton, Rebecca. (2013). Bridges & Barriers to Development: Communication Modes, Media, and Devices. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 17(3).2 indexed citations
14.
Walton, Rebecca. (2013). Stakeholder Flux. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 27(4). 409–435.22 indexed citations
15.
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2012). What’s it for? Expectations of Internet value and usefulness in Central Asia. Information Technologies and International Development. 8(3). 69–84.8 indexed citations
16.
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2011). Defining fast: Factors affecting the experience of speed in humanitarian logistics.. ISCRAM.12 indexed citations
17.
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2011). Defining "fast": Factors affecting perceptions of rapid response to humanitarian disasters. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 1–10.2 indexed citations
Walton, Rebecca, et al.. (2009). Skills Are Not Binary: Nuances in the Relationship Between ICT Skills and Employability. Information Technologies and International Development. 5(2). 1–18.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.