Sarah Dean
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Richard J. SiegertWilliam LevackDavid BaxterBen DarlowKathryn McPhersonAnthony DowellMark WeatherallJean Hay‐Smith
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (31 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (18 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Sarah Dean
125 papers receiving 4.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Pharmacology 1.0k
- General Health Professions 992
- Psychiatry and Mental health 776
- Rehabilitation 652
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 624
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Dean. The network helps show where Sarah Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Dean. Sarah Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | Interprofessional rehabilitation : a person-centred approach | 19 |
| 19 | Patient and clinician perceptions of asthma education and management in resistant asthma: a qualitative study | 5 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Sarah Dean
Sarah Dean is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy and Applied Psychology, having authored 132 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (31 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (652 citations), Occupational Therapy (355 citations) and Pharmacology (1.0k citations). Sarah Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Siegert, William Levack, David Baxter, Ben Darlow, Kathryn McPherson, Anthony Dowell, Mark Weatherall, Jean Hay‐Smith, Meredith Perry and Fiona Mathieson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.