Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Complete nucleotide sequence of the AIDS virus, HTLV-III
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pearson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pearson. The network helps show where Mark Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Pearson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Pearson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Pearson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Pearson. Mark Pearson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scott, Colin, Ortwin Renn, Marie‐Valentine Florin, et al.. (2017). Improving Risk Regulation. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).1 indexed citations
3.
Pearson, Mark. (2017). Lessons from Reporting Islam - a case study of an Australian newspaper's coverage of radicalisation. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 39(1). 47–62.2 indexed citations
4.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2015). Media use of drones - ethics, law and the emerging 'two-tier' system of regulation. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 37(1). 33–49.2 indexed citations
5.
Pearson, Mark. (2014). Towards 'mindful journalism': Applying Buddhism's Eightfold Path as an ethical framework for modern journalism. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 11(4). 38–46.2 indexed citations
6.
Fuller, Thomas, Mark Pearson, & Jaime Peters. (2013). Transparent Reporting, the Foundation for Full Disclosure. European Health Psychologist. 15(3). 67–68.2 indexed citations
7.
Keyzer, Patrick, Jane Johnston, & Mark Pearson. (2012). The Courts and the Media: Challenges in the Era of Digital and Social Media. eYLS (Yale Law School).7 indexed citations
8.
Pearson, Mark. (2011). A Poor Fit for Journalism Research. e-publications@bond (Bond University). 33(1). 25–27.3 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Gordon & Mark Pearson. (2011). Counselling clients from an older generation. ResearchOnline - ND (The University of Notre Dame Australia). 17(3). 12.3 indexed citations
10.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2010). Suppression Orders: Reskilling Journalists and the Judiciary. Bond University Research Portal (Bond University). 32(1). 97–114.2 indexed citations
11.
Pearson, Mark. (2005). Police digital communications and the media. e-publications@bond (Bond University). 27(1). 105.4 indexed citations
12.
Brand, Jeffrey E. & Mark Pearson. (2001). The newsroom versus the lounge room: journalists’ and audiences’ views on news. The Australian Journalism Review. 23(2). 63–89.13 indexed citations
13.
Pearson, Mark. (2000). Advertorials and the Trade Practices Act: why the ‘Golden Tonsils’ saga might prove costly in the long run. The Australian Journalism Review. 22(1). 57.2 indexed citations
14.
Pearson, Mark & Stéfano Scarpetta. (2000). Vue d'ensemble: que savons-nous des politiques de valorisation du travail?. 11–28.
15.
Pearson, Mark. (2000). Reflective practice in action: preparing Samoan journalists to cover court cases. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1(8). 22–33.4 indexed citations
16.
Pearson, Mark. (1999). Curricular implications of the influences of the Internet on journalism.. e-publications@bond (Bond University). 21(2). 27.5 indexed citations
17.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (1994). Cosmetic surgery: newspaper reportage of the Medical Journal of Australia. e-publications@bond (Bond University). 21(2). 109.6 indexed citations
18.
Pearson, Mark. (1988). I want to be a journalist: a study of cadetships.. The Australian Journalism Review.5 indexed citations
19.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (1979). GIM code user's manual for the STAR-100 computer. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.