Anne Spencer

3.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
91 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Anne Spencer is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Spencer has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Anne Spencer's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (26 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (16 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers). Anne Spencer is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (26 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (16 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers). Anne Spencer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Anne Spencer's co-authors include Angela Robinson, Judith Covey, Graham Loomes, Michael Jones‐Lee, Sandra Eldridge, Nick Pidgeon, Gene Feder, Martin Underwood, Susan Chilton and William Hamilton and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Anne Spencer

85 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients

2022 95 citations Anne Spencer, William Hamilton et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anne Spencer United Kingdom	26	765	475	407	267	255	91	2.3k
Benjamin M. Craig United States	28	1.1k 1.4×	631 1.3×	152 0.4×	212 0.8×	151 0.6×	90	2.9k
Paul Brown United States	26	250 0.3×	298 0.6×	112 0.3×	228 0.9×	296 1.2×	87	2.0k
Kim Rand Norway	20	1.1k 1.4×	593 1.2×	106 0.3×	269 1.0×	197 0.8×	79	2.2k
Brendan Mulhern Australia	32	2.3k 3.1×	1.5k 3.2×	236 0.6×	506 1.9×	395 1.5×	168	4.5k
Jørgen T. Lauridsen Denmark	26	783 1.0×	673 1.4×	252 0.6×	157 0.6×	115 0.5×	142	2.7k
Hareth Al‐Janabi United Kingdom	27	1.4k 1.9×	1.3k 2.7×	448 1.1×	451 1.7×	276 1.1×	75	2.8k
Emma Frew United Kingdom	30	738 1.0×	590 1.2×	90 0.2×	139 0.5×	455 1.8×	112	3.1k
Koonal Shah United Kingdom	25	1.9k 2.5×	971 2.0×	105 0.3×	288 1.1×	98 0.4×	91	2.9k
Semra Özdemir Singapore	22	635 0.8×	382 0.8×	77 0.2×	196 0.7×	132 0.5×	126	1.8k
Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi Spain	24	1.7k 2.2×	737 1.6×	103 0.3×	334 1.3×	83 0.3×	56	2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Spencer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Spencer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Spencer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Spencer. The network helps show where Anne Spencer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Spencer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Spencer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Spencer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Spencer. Anne Spencer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dunn, Barnaby D., Emily Widnall, Donald N. Reed, et al.. (2023). Preliminary clinical and cost effectiveness of augmented depression therapy versus cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of anhedonic depression (ADepT): a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, pilot, randomised, controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. 61. 102084–102084. 24 indexed citations

Medina‐Lara, Antonieta, et al.. (2022). Women’s priorities towards ovarian cancer testing: a best–worst scaling study. BMJ Open. 12(9). e061625–e061625.

Price, S.J., Paolo Landa, Rubén Mújica-Mota, William Hamilton, & Anne Spencer. (2022). Revising the Suspected-Cancer Guidelines: Impacts on Patients’ Primary Care Contacts and Costs. Value in Health. 26(7). 995–1002.

Medina‐Lara, Antonieta, et al.. (2021). Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review. Patient. 15(3). 269–285. 17 indexed citations

Tarrant, Mark, Sarah Dean, Rod S Taylor, et al.. (2021). Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility. BMJ Open. 11(1). e040544–e040544. 19 indexed citations

Medina‐Lara, Antonieta, Ruth Lewis, Jaime Peters, et al.. (2020). Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment. 24(66). 1–332. 28 indexed citations

Ward, Thomas, Antonieta Medina‐Lara, Rubén Mújica-Mota, & Anne Spencer. (2020). PCN134 Heterogeneity Considerations in Economic Analyses of Cancer. Value in Health. 23. S447–S447. 1 indexed citations

Landa, Paolo, Michael Allen, Anne Spencer, et al.. (2018). A framework to address key issues of neonatal service configuration in England: the NeoNet multimethods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(35). 1–160. 6 indexed citations

Dean, Sarah, Leon Poltawski, Anne Förster, et al.. (2018). Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility. BMJ Open. 8(2). e018409–e018409. 35 indexed citations

10.

Tarrant, Mark, Mary Carter, Sarah Dean, et al.. (2018). Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention to improve well-being. BMJ Open. 8(9). e025167–e025167. 7 indexed citations

11.

Shepherd, Anthony I., Richard Pulsford, Leon Poltawski, et al.. (2018). Physical activity, sleep, and fatigue in community dwelling Stroke Survivors. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 7900–7900. 25 indexed citations

12.

White, Mathew P., Lewis R. Elliott, Tim Taylor, et al.. (2016). Recreational physical activity in natural environments and implications for health: A population based cross-sectional study in England. Preventive Medicine. 91. 383–388. 120 indexed citations

13.

Dean, Sarah, Leon Poltawski, Anne Förster, et al.. (2016). Community-based Rehabilitation Training after stroke: protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain). BMJ Open. 6(10). e012375–e012375. 22 indexed citations

14.

Devine, Angela, Anne Spencer, Sandra Eldridge, Richard Norman, & Gene Feder. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS), a domestic violence training and support programme for primary care: a modelling study based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2(3). e001008–e001008. 51 indexed citations

15.

Feder, Gene, Jean Ramsay, Danielle Dunne, et al.. (2009). Appendices : How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria Health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment. 13(16). 137–347. 23 indexed citations

16.

Underwood, Martin, Deborah Ashby, Dawn Carnes, et al.. (2008). Topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people. The TOIB study. Health Technology Assessment. 12(22). iii–iv, ix. 43 indexed citations

17.

Cross, Pamela L, Deborah Ashby, G Harding, et al.. (2005). TOIB Study. Are topical or oral ibuprofen equally effective for the treatment of chronic knee pain presenting in primary care: a randomised controlled trial with patient preference study. [ISRCTN79353052]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 6(1). 55–55. 12 indexed citations

18.

Chilton, Susan & Anne Spencer. (2001). Empirical Evidence of Inconsistency in Standard Gamble Choices Under Direct and Indirect Elicitation Methods. Zeitschrift für schweizerische Statistik und Volkswirtschaft/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik/Swiss journal of economics and statistics. 137. 65–86. 8 indexed citations

19.

Torgerson, David & Anne Spencer. (1996). Marginal costs and benefits. BMJ. 312(7022). 35–36. 34 indexed citations

20.

Fine, JD, Hwei‐Fang Tien, C. M. Suchindran, et al.. (1994). Classification and regression tree (CART) statistical technique for diagnosis of major types of inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB). A split sample analysis of the national EB registry dataset. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 103(6). 846. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact