Ruth A. Lamont
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 0.2%
- Health top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hannah J. SwiftDominic AbramsLisbeth DruryLinda ClareCatherine QuinnSharon M. NelisAnthony MartyrChristina Victor
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers)Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Ruth A. Lamont
26 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 426
- Health 297
- General Health Professions 283
- Sociology and Political Science 263
- Social Psychology 254
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth A. Lamont
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth A. Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth A. Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth A. Lamont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth A. Lamont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth A. Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth A. Lamont. The network helps show where Ruth A. Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth A. Lamont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth A. Lamont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth A. Lamont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth A. Lamont. Ruth A. Lamont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 83 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 183 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | The perception of ageing and age discrimination | 4 |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage.breakdown → | 363 |
| 20 | 36 |
About Ruth A. Lamont
Ruth A. Lamont is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (426 citations), Health (297 citations) and Applied Psychology (116 citations). Ruth A. Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hannah J. Swift, Dominic Abrams, Lisbeth Drury, Linda Clare, Catherine Quinn, Sharon M. Nelis, Anthony Martyr, Christina Victor, John V. Hindle and Isla Rippon. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Frontiers in Psychology and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.