William Levack

104 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

William Levack
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Rehabilitation 528
  • Occupational Therapy 297
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 496
  • General Health Professions 640
  • Emergency Medicine 221
Replace Petrea Cornwell with:
Petrea Cornwell Australia
Barbara Resnick United States
Karen A. Hart United States
Mary Egan Canada
Harry Crebolder Netherlands
Bev OʼConnell Australia
Julie Gassaway United States
Susanne Bernhardsson Sweden
Lori Letts Canada
Megan Davidson Australia
William Levack relative to Petrea Cornwell Australia Petrea Cornwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Petrea Cornwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Levack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Levack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Levack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Levack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Levack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Levack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Levack. The network helps show where William Levack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Levack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Levack Line = papers co-authored together William Levack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010183
2 2006167
3 2015165
4 2009156
5 2011139
6 2005107
7 201375
8 200958
9 200457
10 201649
11 201246
12 201441
13 201937
14 201436
15
Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit in adult rehabilitation: summary of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.
201636
16 201933
17 201432
18 201631
19 200630
20 202227

About William Levack

William Levack is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 110 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (26 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (20 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (13 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (10 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (528 citations), Occupational Therapy (297 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (496 citations), General Health Professions (640 citations) and Emergency Medicine (221 citations). William Levack has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Siegert, Sarah Dean, Kathryn McPherson, Mark Weatherall, Joanna K. Fadyl, Nicola Kayes, Kathryn McPherson, E. Jean C. Hay-Smith, Jennifer Freeman and E. Diane Playford. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, BMJ Open, European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and British Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026