Sara McComb

1.8k total citations
61 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Sara McComb is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara McComb has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 10 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Sara McComb's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (17 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (8 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers). Sara McComb is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (17 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (8 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers). Sara McComb collaborates with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Italy. Sara McComb's co-authors include Deanna M. Kennedy, W. Dale Compton, Vicki Simpson, S. G. Green, Stephen G. Green, Joi‐Lynn Mondisa, Megan Hebdon, Laura P. Sands, Kevin Hinchey and Elizabeth A. Henneman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Sara McComb

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sara McComb United States 20 325 198 169 142 130 61 1.1k
Christina N. Lacerenza United States 13 555 1.7× 217 1.1× 74 0.4× 197 1.4× 187 1.4× 29 1.5k
Cameron Klein United States 6 627 1.9× 190 1.0× 174 1.0× 217 1.5× 154 1.2× 10 1.6k
Shannon L. Marlow United States 13 586 1.8× 242 1.2× 68 0.4× 196 1.4× 165 1.3× 22 1.5k
Dana E. Sims United States 4 714 2.2× 211 1.1× 102 0.6× 219 1.5× 120 0.9× 6 1.8k
François Chiocchio Canada 16 261 0.8× 266 1.3× 201 1.2× 119 0.8× 69 0.5× 50 968
Kimberly A. Smith‐Jentsch United States 14 892 2.7× 127 0.6× 193 1.1× 239 1.7× 103 0.8× 35 1.9k
James A. Grand United States 17 325 1.0× 96 0.5× 104 0.6× 107 0.8× 83 0.6× 36 1.0k
Martha Reeves United States 5 229 0.7× 166 0.8× 59 0.3× 109 0.8× 176 1.4× 11 951
Susan A. Wheelan United States 21 773 2.4× 185 0.9× 177 1.0× 307 2.2× 93 0.7× 45 1.7k
Kevin C. Stagl United States 7 917 2.8× 168 0.8× 239 1.4× 302 2.1× 126 1.0× 15 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Sara McComb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara McComb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara McComb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara McComb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara McComb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara McComb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara McComb. The network helps show where Sara McComb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara McComb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara McComb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara McComb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara McComb. Sara McComb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2022). The Moderating Effects of Task Complexity and Age on the Relationship between Automation Use and Cognitive Workload. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 40(7). 1746–1764. 5 indexed citations
2.
Ahmed, Azza H., et al.. (2018). The Effect of Concept Maps on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Critical Thinking. Nursing Education Perspectives. 39(4). 208–214. 19 indexed citations
3.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2018). Nurse‐to‐nurse shift handoffs on medical–surgical units: A process within the flow of nursing care. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 27(5-6). e1189–e1201. 17 indexed citations
4.
McComb, Sara, Zhiyi Tian, Laura P. Sands, et al.. (2017). Cancelled Primary Care Appointments: A Prospective Cohort Study of Diabetic Patients. Journal of Medical Systems. 41(4). 53–53. 25 indexed citations
5.
Simpson, Vicki, et al.. (2017). Enhancing Critical Thinking Via a Clinical Scholar Approach. Journal of Nursing Education. 56(11). 679–682. 4 indexed citations
6.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2016). Educating Next Generation Nursing Leaders and Enhancing Education-Practice Partnerships: The Role of Quality Improvement Projects. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mondisa, Joi‐Lynn & Sara McComb. (2015). Social Community: A Mechanism to Explain the Success of STEM Minority Mentoring Programs. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning. 23(2). 149–163. 32 indexed citations
8.
9.
Hebdon, Megan, et al.. (2015). Shared Mental Models of Provider Roles in Cancer Survivorship Care. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology. 6(4). 334–48. 4 indexed citations
10.
Türkcan, Ayten, et al.. (2015). The impact of interventions on appointment and clinical outcomes for individuals with diabetes: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 15(1). 355–355. 27 indexed citations
11.
Kennedy, Deanna M. & Sara McComb. (2014). When teams shift among processes: Insights from simulation and optimization.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 99(5). 784–815. 32 indexed citations
12.
Hebdon, Megan, et al.. (2014). Transitioning Patients to Survivorship Care: A Systematic Review. Oncology nursing forum. 41(6). 615–625. 24 indexed citations
13.
McComb, Sara & Megan Hebdon. (2013). Enhancing Patient Outcomes in Healthcare Systems Through Multidisciplinary Teamwork. Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 17(6). 669–672. 12 indexed citations
14.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2013). Safety Checklist Briefings: A Systematic Review of the Literature. AORN Journal. 99(1). 125–125. 29 indexed citations
15.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2012). Improving Teamwork on General Medical Units: When Teams Do Not Work Face-to-Face. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 38(10). 471–478. 11 indexed citations
16.
Bourne, Kristina A., et al.. (2012). Towards an understanding of the relationship between family-oriented benefits and employee behaviors: Does coworker support matter?. Journal of Management & Organization. 18(1). 64–80. 1 indexed citations
17.
Kennedy, Deanna M., et al.. (2012). Examining the “Exchange” in Leader–Member Exchange. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 19(4). 407–423. 19 indexed citations
18.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2012). Enhancing Learning Through an Interprofessional Project Competition. Journal of Nursing Education. 51(12). 706–709. 1 indexed citations
19.
McComb, Sara, et al.. (2010). Temporal Patterns of Mental Model Convergence: Implications for Distributed Teams Interacting in Electronic Collaboration Spaces. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 52(2). 264–281. 34 indexed citations
20.
McComb, Sara, Deanna M. Kennedy, S. G. Green, & W. Dale Compton. (2008). Project team effectiveness: the case for sufficient setup and top management involvement. Production Planning & Control. 19(4). 301–311. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christina N. Lacerenza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cameron Klein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shannon L. Marlow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dana E. Sims Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by François Chiocchio Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kimberly A. Smith‐Jentsch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James A. Grand Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martha Reeves Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan A. Wheelan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kevin C. Stagl
Rankless by CCL
2026