Sara LaBelle

726 citations
41 papers · 483 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Communication in Education and Healthcare 23
    • Humor Studies and Applications 4
    • Online and Blended Learning 8

Sara LaBelle

37 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Sara LaBelle
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Social Psychology 282
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Communication 50
  • Education 167
  • Applied Psychology 20
Replace José L. Sáiz with:
José L. Sáiz Chile
Robert J. Sidelinger United States
Rachel Maunder United Kingdom
Shu‐Sha Angie Guan United States
Tae‐Seop Lim United States
Blair Thompson United States
Deborah Ko United States
Margaret Zoller Booth United States
Cyndi Kernahan United States
Jeffrey Andreas Tan United States
Sara LaBelle relative to José L. Sáiz Chile José L. Sáiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
José L. Sáiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara LaBelle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara LaBelle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara LaBelle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara LaBelle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara LaBelle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara LaBelle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara LaBelle. The network helps show where Sara LaBelle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Sara LaBelle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara LaBelle Line = papers co-authored together Sara LaBelle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201652
2 201344
3 201733
4 201331
5 201430
6 201125
7 201525
8 201924
9 201823
10 201821
11 201420
12 201418
13 201315
14 202014
15 201512
16 20169
17 20219
18 20199
19 20168
20 20208

About Sara LaBelle

Sara LaBelle is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and General Health Professions, having authored 41 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (23 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (7 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (4 papers) and Media Influence and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (282 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Communication (50 citations), Education (167 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). Sara LaBelle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Zac D. Johnson, Matthew M. Martin, Gregory A. Cranmer, Keith Weber, Megan R. Dillow, Melissa Bekelja Wanzer, Timothy J. Servoss, Zachary W. Goldman, Jennifer H. Waldeck and Melanie Booth‐Butterfield. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Education, Communication Research Reports, Communication Quarterly, Journal of American College Health and Western Journal of Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact