Tae‐Seop Lim

1.0k total citations
22 papers, 643 citations indexed

About

Tae‐Seop Lim is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Tae‐Seop Lim has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 643 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Tae‐Seop Lim's work include Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers). Tae‐Seop Lim is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers). Tae‐Seop Lim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Korea. Tae‐Seop Lim's co-authors include John Waite Bowers, Howard Giles, Hiroshi Ōta, Kathy Kellermann, Lilnabeth P. Somera, Angie Williams, Sik Hung Ng, Ellen B. Ryan, Kimberly A. Noels and Jihyun Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Communication Research and Human Communication Research.

In The Last Decade

Tae‐Seop Lim

21 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tae‐Seop Lim United States	11	310	229	208	116	92	22	643
Lilnabeth P. Somera United States	10	250 0.8×	240 1.0×	48 0.2×	201 1.7×	59 0.6×	24	614
Daniel H. Mansson United States	17	349 1.1×	371 1.6×	28 0.1×	156 1.3×	46 0.5×	47	668
Alberta Contarello Italy	13	274 0.9×	209 0.9×	35 0.2×	42 0.4×	75 0.8×	38	543
Christine E. Rittenour United States	16	253 0.8×	321 1.4×	24 0.1×	35 0.3×	39 0.4×	35	586
Kelby K. Halone United States	13	263 0.8×	251 1.1×	65 0.3×	6 0.1×	49 0.5×	17	565
Walter R. Zakahi United States	10	293 0.9×	93 0.4×	70 0.3×	8 0.1×	34 0.4×	22	463
Lynne M. Webb United States	9	173 0.6×	298 1.3×	40 0.2×	10 0.1×	29 0.3×	33	555
Sylvie Graf Czechia	13	269 0.9×	445 1.9×	17 0.1×	39 0.3×	34 0.4×	28	580
Andy J. Merolla United States	16	474 1.5×	337 1.5×	25 0.1×	13 0.1×	121 1.3×	46	776
Aimee E. Miller‐Ott United States	13	191 0.6×	315 1.4×	39 0.2×	8 0.1×	34 0.4×	25	484

Countries citing papers authored by Tae‐Seop Lim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tae‐Seop Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tae‐Seop Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tae‐Seop Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tae‐Seop Lim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tae‐Seop Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tae‐Seop Lim. The network helps show where Tae‐Seop Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tae‐Seop Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tae‐Seop Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tae‐Seop Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tae‐Seop Lim. Tae‐Seop Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Lim, Tae‐Seop, et al.. (2025). Assessing the universality of face needs across China, Japan, Korea, and the U.S. using an inductive approach of face needs measurement. Asian Journal of Communication. 35(4). 326–350.

Lim, Tae‐Seop, et al.. (2016). Communicating Healthy Food Choice: Cultural Difference in Regulatory Focus. 13(1). 131–156. 1 indexed citations

Lim, Tae‐Seop, Hayeon Song, Emily Cramer, et al.. (2016). Healthy food and cultural holism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 52. 49–59. 2 indexed citations

Song, Hayeon, Tae‐Seop Lim, Emily Cramer, et al.. (2015). Exploring cultural differences in women's body weight perception: The impact of self-construal on perceived overweight and engagement in health activities. Health Care For Women International. 37(11). 1203–1220. 8 indexed citations

Kim, Sang‐Yeon, et al.. (2015). Predicting Alcohol Misuse Among College Students in the US and South Korea. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 14(3). 308–322. 4 indexed citations

Lim, Tae‐Seop, et al.. (2011). Holism: A Missing Link in Individualism-Collectivism Research. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 40(1). 21–38. 19 indexed citations

Kim, Jihyun, Tae‐Seop Lim, Kathryn Dindia, & Nancy Burrell. (2010). Reframing the Cultural Differences between the East and the West. Communication Studies. 61(5). 543–566. 13 indexed citations

Barker, Valerie, Howard Giles, Christopher Hajek, et al.. (2008). Police-Civilian Interaction, Compliance, Accommodation, and Trust in an Intergroup Context: International Data. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication. 1(2). 93–112. 13 indexed citations

Lim, Tae‐Seop, et al.. (2008). Differences in Cognitive Relativity Between Americans’ and Koreans’ Assessments of Self. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 37(2). 105–118. 3 indexed citations

10.

Giles, Howard, Valerie Barker, Christopher Hajek, et al.. (2007). Compliance, Accommodation, and Trust in an Intergroup Context: International Data. 1–28. 1 indexed citations

11.

Giles, Howard, Kimberly A. Noels, Angie Williams, et al.. (2003). Intergenerational Communication Across Cultures: Young People's Perceptions of Conversations with Family Elders, Non-family Elders and Same-Age Peers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 18(1). 1–32. 87 indexed citations

12.

Giles, Howard, Hiroshi Ōta, Sik Hung Ng, et al.. (2000). Age Vitality Across Eleven Nations. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 21(4). 308–323. 47 indexed citations

13.

Williams, Angie, Hiroshi Ōta, Howard Giles, et al.. (1997). Young People's Beliefs About Intergenerational Communication. Communication Research. 24(4). 370–393. 80 indexed citations

14.

Lim, Tae‐Seop & John Waite Bowers. (1991). Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact. Human Communication Research. 17(3). 415–450. 246 indexed citations

15.

Lim, Tae‐Seop. (1990). The influences of receivers' resistance on persuaders' verbal aggressiveness. Communication Quarterly. 38(2). 170–188. 25 indexed citations

16.

Kellermann, Kathy & Tae‐Seop Lim. (1990). The conversation MOP: III. Timing of scenes in discourse.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59(6). 1163–1179. 13 indexed citations

17.

Kellermann, Kathy & Tae‐Seop Lim. (1990). The conversation MOP: III. Timing of scenes in discourse.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59(6). 1163–1179. 14 indexed citations

18.

Kellermann, Kathy, et al.. (1989). The conversation mop: Scenes in the stream of discourse. Discourse Processes. 12(1). 27–61. 41 indexed citations

19.

Lim, Tae‐Seop. (1988). A new model of politeness in discourse. Michigan State University Libraries. 3 indexed citations

20.

Gudykunst, William B. & Tae‐Seop Lim. (1985). Ethnicity, Sex, and Self Perceptions of Communicator Style. Communication Research Reports. 2(1). 68–75. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact