Sara Brookes
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jane BlazebyAngus McNairPaula WilliamsonDerek AldersonNicola HarmanSarah L. GorstKaren L. BarnesMike Clarke
- Topics
- Delphi Technique in Research (14 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers)Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Sara Brookes
46 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Sociology and Political Science 891
- Surgery 798
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 587
- Epidemiology 573
- Economics and Econometrics 541
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Brookes
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Brookes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Brookes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Brookes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Brookes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Brookes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Brookes. The network helps show where Sara Brookes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Brookes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Brookes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Brookes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Brookes. Sara Brookes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | Comments on Chevance et al ‘Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders’ | 3 |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 112 | |
| 12 | Epidemiology, evidence-based medicine and public health: lecture notes. | 5 |
| 13 | Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes following esophagectomy: A systematic review. | 1 |
| 14 | 125 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 116 | |
| 20 | 120 |
About Sara Brookes
Sara Brookes is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Emergency Medical Services and Family Practice, having authored 46 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Delphi Technique in Research (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (139 citations), Sociology and Political Science (891 citations) and General Health Professions (512 citations). Sara Brookes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jane Blazeby, Angus McNair, Paula Williamson, Derek Alderson, Nicola Harman, Sarah L. Gorst, Karen L. Barnes, Mike Clarke, Jamie J Kirkham and Bridget Young. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.