Sara Brookes

5.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
46 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Sara Brookes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara Brookes has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Surgery and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Sara Brookes's work include Delphi Technique in Research (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers). Sara Brookes is often cited by papers focused on Delphi Technique in Research (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers). Sara Brookes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Sara Brookes's co-authors include Jane Blazeby, Angus McNair, Paula Williamson, Derek Alderson, Nicola Harman, Sarah L. Gorst, Karen L. Barnes, Mike Clarke, Jamie J Kirkham and Bridget Young and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Sara Brookes

46 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 2018 250 500 750 1000

Peers

Sara Brookes
Julie Barber United Kingdom
Angus McNair United Kingdom
L Scalone Italy
John E. Ware United States
Elizabeth Gargon United Kingdom
Sarah L. Gorst United Kingdom
Ian Sinha United Kingdom
Nicola Harman United Kingdom
Sara Brookes
Citations per year, relative to Sara Brookes Sara Brookes (= 1×) peers Duncan Hunter

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Brookes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Brookes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Brookes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Brookes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Brookes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Brookes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Brookes. The network helps show where Sara Brookes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Brookes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Brookes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Brookes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Brookes. Sara Brookes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thorn, Joanna, Mei‐See Man, Katherine Chaplin, et al.. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 10(1). e030110–e030110. 13 indexed citations
2.
Williamson, Paula, Jane Blazeby, Sara Brookes, et al.. (2020). Comments on Chevance et al ‘Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders’. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 3 indexed citations
3.
Young, Amber, et al.. (2019). Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care. BMJ Open. 9(2). e025135–e025135. 23 indexed citations
4.
Fish, Rebecca, Caroline Sanders, Richard Adams, et al.. (2018). A core outcome set for clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy interventions for anal cancer (CORMAC): a patient and health-care professional consensus. ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 3(12). 865–873. 46 indexed citations
5.
Young, Amber, Sara Brookes, Nichola Rumsey, & Jane Blazeby. (2017). Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set. BMJ Open. 7(6). e017267–e017267. 18 indexed citations
6.
Potter, Shelley, Sara Brookes, Christopher Holcombe, Joseph Ward, & Jane Blazeby. (2016). Exploring methods the for selection and integration of stakeholder views in the development of core outcome sets: a case study in reconstructive breast surgery. Trials. 17(1). 463–463. 8 indexed citations
7.
Mann, Cindy, Alison Shaw, Bruce Guthrie, et al.. (2016). Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: the 3D study. BMJ Open. 6(5). e011260–e011260. 24 indexed citations
8.
Man, Mei‐See, Katherine Chaplin, Cindy Mann, et al.. (2016). Improving the management of multimorbidity in general practice: protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (The 3D Study). BMJ Open. 6(4). e011261–e011261. 31 indexed citations
9.
McNair, Angus, Rhiannon Macefield, Natalie Blencowe, Sara Brookes, & Jane Blazeby. (2016). ‘Trial Exegesis’: Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 11(8). e0160998–e0160998. 3 indexed citations
11.
Nicholson, Alexandra, et al.. (2015). Effectiveness of hand hygiene interventions in reducing illness absence among children in educational settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 101(1). 42–50. 112 indexed citations
12.
Ben‐Shlomo, Yoav, Sara Brookes, & Matthew Hickman. (2013). Epidemiology, evidence-based medicine and public health: lecture notes.. John Wiley & Sons eBooks. 5 indexed citations
13.
Blencowe, Natalie, Sean Strong, Angus McNair, et al.. (2012). Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes following esophagectomy: A systematic review.. Annals of Surgery. 255(4). 1 indexed citations
14.
Toerien, Merran, Sara Brookes, Chris Metcalfe, et al.. (2009). A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials. 10(1). 52–52. 125 indexed citations
15.
Brookes, Sara, Lucy Biddle, Charlotte Paterson, Gillian Woolhead, & Paul Dieppe. (2007). "Me's me and you's you": Exploring patients' perspectives of single patient (n-of-1) trials in the UK. Trials. 8(1). 10–10. 15 indexed citations
16.
English, Rachel, Sara Brookes, Kerry Avery, Jane Blazeby, & Yoav Ben‐Shlomo. (2006). The effectiveness and reliability of peer‐marking in first‐year medical students. Medical Education. 40(10). 965–972. 41 indexed citations
17.
Wetherell, Mark, Lucie Byrne‐Davis, Paul Dieppe, et al.. (2005). Effects of Emotional Disclosure on Psychological and Physiological Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Exploratory Home-based Study. Journal of Health Psychology. 10(2). 277–285. 46 indexed citations
18.
Blazeby, Jane, et al.. (2003). Feasibility of quality of life assessment in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 89(3). 497–501. 24 indexed citations
19.
Blazeby, Jane, Sara Brookes, & Derek Alderson. (2001). The prognostic value of quality of life scores during treatment for oesophageal cancer. Gut. 49(2). 227–230. 116 indexed citations
20.
Blazeby, Jane, et al.. (1995). Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer.. Gut. 37(4). 505–508. 120 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026