Alison Shaw
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 19
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 18
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Family Practice top 5%
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 11
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 8
-
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research 7
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 7
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 7
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 6
- Co-authors
- Debbie SharpMatthew J RiddDavid KeßlerAlice MalpassChris SalisburyGlyn LewisKatharine CharsleyElizabeth Thompson
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alison Shaw
126 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Complementary and alternative medicine 415
- General Health Professions 1.2k
- Applied Psychology 191
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 70
- Family Practice 59
Countries citing papers authored by Alison Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Shaw. The network helps show where Alison Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 19 | Walking a line between health care and sales: the role of the medicines counter assistant | 2005 | 18 |
| 20 | 1999 | 21 |
About Alison Shaw
Alison Shaw is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, General Health Professions and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 127 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (19 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (18 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (7 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (415 citations), General Health Professions (1.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (191 citations). Alison Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Debbie Sharp, Matthew J Ridd, David Keßler, Alice Malpass, Chris Salisbury, Glyn Lewis, Katharine Charsley, Elizabeth Thompson, Gene Feder and Fiona M Walter. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Health & Social Care in the Community, Trials, British Journal of General Practice and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.