Sean Strong

1.6k total citations
23 papers, 704 citations indexed

About

Sean Strong is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Sean Strong has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 704 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Sean Strong's work include Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). Sean Strong is often cited by papers focused on Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). Sean Strong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Sean Strong's co-authors include Jane Blazeby, Natalie Blencowe, Angus McNair, Sara Brookes, Tom Crosby, S M Griffin, Jenny Donovan, Caroline Wilson, Sangeetha Paramasivan and William Hollingworth and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, BMJ and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Sean Strong

23 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sean Strong United Kingdom 13 370 244 170 101 98 23 704
Jonathan Bergman United States 18 256 0.7× 307 1.3× 242 1.4× 35 0.3× 172 1.8× 60 962
M. A. G. Sprangers Netherlands 15 411 1.1× 339 1.4× 106 0.6× 140 1.4× 120 1.2× 31 1.0k
Christopher M. Deibert United States 14 300 0.8× 115 0.5× 120 0.7× 21 0.2× 166 1.7× 58 791
Sonĵa E. Hall Australia 15 287 0.8× 109 0.4× 122 0.7× 27 0.3× 107 1.1× 21 910
Loretta Erhunmwunsee United States 16 283 0.8× 401 1.6× 132 0.8× 42 0.4× 73 0.7× 60 913
Johannes Morche Germany 8 181 0.5× 74 0.3× 77 0.5× 37 0.4× 118 1.2× 15 547
Briony K. Varda United States 18 395 1.1× 307 1.3× 83 0.5× 22 0.2× 46 0.5× 50 983
M.E. Rodríguez Socarrás Spain 16 275 0.7× 393 1.6× 134 0.8× 20 0.2× 168 1.7× 64 924
Jessica Phillips United States 14 275 0.7× 95 0.4× 60 0.4× 25 0.2× 132 1.3× 50 757
Karla Bernardi United States 15 481 1.3× 120 0.5× 155 0.9× 17 0.2× 98 1.0× 48 765

Countries citing papers authored by Sean Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sean Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sean Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sean Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sean Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sean Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sean Strong. The network helps show where Sean Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sean Strong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sean Strong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sean Strong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sean Strong. Sean Strong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wilson, Caroline, Leila Rooshenas, Sangeetha Paramasivan, et al.. (2018). Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework. Trials. 19(1). 50–50. 51 indexed citations
2.
Savović, Jelena, Natalie Blencowe, Jane Blazeby, et al.. (2017). Methodological overview of systematic reviews to establish the evidence base for emergency general surgery. British journal of surgery. 104(5). 513–524. 8 indexed citations
3.
4.
Brookes, Sara, Rhiannon Macefield, Paula Williamson, et al.. (2016). Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development. Trials. 17(1). 409–409. 75 indexed citations
5.
Rooshenas, Leila, Daisy Elliott, Julia Wade, et al.. (2016). Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians’ Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS Medicine. 13(10). e1002147–e1002147. 73 indexed citations
6.
Strong, Sean, et al.. (2015). How good are surgeons at identifying appendicitis? Results from a multi-centre cohort study. International Journal of Surgery. 15. 107–112. 24 indexed citations
7.
Blencowe, Natalie, Sean Strong, Angus McNair, et al.. (2015). Assessing the quality of written information provision for surgical procedures: a case study in oesophagectomy. BMJ Open. 5(10). e008536–e008536. 9 indexed citations
8.
Paramasivan, Sangeetha, Sean Strong, Caroline Wilson, et al.. (2015). A simple technique to identify key recruitment issues in randomised controlled trials: Q-QAT - quanti-qualitative appointment timing. Trials. 16(1). 88–88. 22 indexed citations
9.
Brookes, Sara, Rhiannon Macefield, Paula Williamson, et al.. (2015). Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development. Trials. 16(S2). 1 indexed citations
10.
Blencowe, Natalie, et al.. (2014). The use of social media for recruitment and communication in multicentre collaborative studies. International Journal of Surgery. 12. S51–S51. 1 indexed citations
11.
Blazeby, Jane, Sean Strong, Jenny Donovan, et al.. (2014). Feasibility RCT of definitive chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal squamous cell cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 111(2). 234–240. 27 indexed citations
12.
Main, Barry, Sean Strong, Angus McNair, et al.. (2014). Reporting outcomes of definitive radiation-based treatment for esophageal cancer: a review of the literature. Diseases of the Esophagus. 28(2). 156–163. 3 indexed citations
13.
Blencowe, Natalie, et al.. (2013). Spontaneous oesophageal rupture. BMJ. 346(may31 1). f3095–f3095. 23 indexed citations
14.
15.
Blazeby, Jane, et al.. (2013). Are multidisciplinary teams in secondary care cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 11(1). 7–7. 70 indexed citations
16.
Blencowe, Natalie, Sean Strong, Angus McNair, et al.. (2012). Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes following esophagectomy: A systematic review.. Annals of Surgery. 255(4). 1 indexed citations
17.
Strong, Sean, et al.. (2012). Aorto-conduit fistula developing four years after esophagectomy. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2012(2). 8–8. 3 indexed citations
18.
Blencowe, Natalie, Sean Strong, Angus McNair, et al.. (2012). Reporting of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery. 255(4). 658–666. 224 indexed citations
19.
Strong, Sean, Natalie Blencowe, Colette Reid, et al.. (2012). The role of multi-disciplinary teams in decision-making for patients with recurrent malignant disease. Palliative Medicine. 26(7). 954–958. 6 indexed citations
20.
Ward, Steve, et al.. (2010). Delays to appendicectomy within a split‐site hospital. Clinical Governance An International Journal. 15(4). 283–291. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026