Zelda Tomlin

605 total citations
9 papers, 459 citations indexed

About

Zelda Tomlin is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Zelda Tomlin has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 459 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Zelda Tomlin's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Zelda Tomlin is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Zelda Tomlin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Uganda. Zelda Tomlin's co-authors include Jenny Donovan, Isabel de Salis, Merran Toerien, Christopher Humphrey, Stephen Rogers, Graham Thornicroft, Louise M. Howard, T. J. Peters, Jonathan A C Sterne and Sara Brookes and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Expectations, Trials and Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

In The Last Decade

Zelda Tomlin

9 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Zelda Tomlin United Kingdom 7 223 219 92 76 41 9 459
Zoë Skea United Kingdom 13 266 1.2× 243 1.1× 103 1.1× 93 1.2× 35 0.9× 21 618
Inês B. Henriques United Kingdom 4 101 0.5× 147 0.7× 81 0.9× 69 0.9× 26 0.6× 4 388
Sarah Ronaldson United Kingdom 11 150 0.7× 113 0.5× 142 1.5× 36 0.5× 35 0.9× 31 445
Claiborne Miller‐Davis United States 10 273 1.2× 207 0.9× 43 0.5× 45 0.6× 14 0.3× 16 536
Cara Evans Canada 9 200 0.9× 133 0.6× 76 0.8× 32 0.4× 19 0.5× 22 406
Helga E. Breimaier Austria 8 309 1.4× 87 0.4× 50 0.5× 25 0.3× 25 0.6× 10 462
Paul Chaulk Canada 5 180 0.8× 125 0.6× 77 0.8× 14 0.2× 21 0.5× 8 359
Ian Schmid United States 11 93 0.4× 71 0.3× 70 0.8× 51 0.7× 16 0.4× 22 402
Samantha Chakraborty Australia 10 182 0.8× 110 0.5× 78 0.8× 26 0.3× 14 0.3× 35 364
Leah Boulos Canada 12 162 0.7× 92 0.4× 31 0.3× 25 0.3× 17 0.4× 30 478

Countries citing papers authored by Zelda Tomlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zelda Tomlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zelda Tomlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zelda Tomlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zelda Tomlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zelda Tomlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zelda Tomlin. The network helps show where Zelda Tomlin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zelda Tomlin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zelda Tomlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zelda Tomlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zelda Tomlin. Zelda Tomlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Tomlin, Zelda, et al.. (2012). Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized‐controlled trials: implications for informed consent. Health Expectations. 17(5). 670–682. 19 indexed citations
2.
Tomlin, Zelda, Susan Peirce, Glyn Elwyn, & Alex Faulkner. (2012). The adoption space of early-emerging technologies: evaluation, innovation, gatekeeping (PATH). Final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 4 indexed citations
3.
Toerien, Merran, Sara Brookes, Chris Metcalfe, et al.. (2009). A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials. 10(1). 52–52. 125 indexed citations
4.
Salis, Isabel de, Zelda Tomlin, Merran Toerien, & Jenny Donovan. (2008). Qualitative research to improve RCT recruitment: Issues arising in establishing research collaborations. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 29(5). 663–670. 44 indexed citations
5.
Salis, Isabel de, Zelda Tomlin, Merran Toerien, & Jenny Donovan. (2008). Using qualitative research methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: The Quartet study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 13(3_suppl). 92–96. 39 indexed citations
6.
Howard, Louise M., Isabel de Salis, Zelda Tomlin, Graham Thornicroft, & Jenny Donovan. (2008). Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 30(1). 40–46. 104 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Roger, et al.. (2006). General practitioners with special interests: evolution and evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 11(2). 106–109. 14 indexed citations
8.
Tomlin, Zelda, Christopher Humphrey, & Stephen Rogers. (1999). General practitioners' perceptions of effective health care. BMJ. 318(7197). 1532–1535. 109 indexed citations
9.
Tomlin, Zelda. (1990). Hurdles on the path to medical audit.. PubMed. 100(5211). 1104–1104. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026