M Deverill

4.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
30 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

M Deverill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, M Deverill has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in M Deverill's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). M Deverill is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). M Deverill collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Finland. M Deverill's co-authors include John Brazier, Jennifer Roberts, Colin Green, Martin White, Luke Vale, Nigel Armstrong, Aziz Sheikh, RS Bhopal, Emma Davidson and Mark Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, BMC Public Health and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

In The Last Decade

M Deverill

28 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

The estimation of a preference-based measure of health fr... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M Deverill United Kingdom 14 1.8k 1.0k 405 364 326 30 3.6k
L Scalone Italy 23 1.7k 0.9× 868 0.8× 556 1.4× 383 1.1× 477 1.5× 84 5.1k
James W. Shaw United States 27 1.4k 0.8× 842 0.8× 464 1.1× 258 0.7× 313 1.0× 92 3.6k
Andrea Manca United Kingdom 35 1.8k 1.0× 846 0.8× 736 1.8× 340 0.9× 381 1.2× 108 4.6k
Dominik Golicki Poland 27 1.7k 0.9× 921 0.9× 708 1.7× 287 0.8× 541 1.7× 93 4.4k
Oliver Rivero‐Arias United Kingdom 35 1.4k 0.8× 758 0.7× 297 0.7× 297 0.8× 306 0.9× 125 3.6k
Rosalind Rabin United Kingdom 5 1.2k 0.7× 890 0.9× 899 2.2× 465 1.3× 630 1.9× 5 4.8k
Sonja M. Hunt United Kingdom 23 785 0.4× 1.0k 1.0× 636 1.6× 360 1.0× 433 1.3× 49 4.6k
You‐Shan Feng Germany 14 869 0.5× 494 0.5× 383 0.9× 223 0.6× 294 0.9× 39 3.1k
Danny Ruta United Kingdom 32 1.0k 0.6× 957 0.9× 949 2.3× 602 1.7× 472 1.4× 64 5.1k
Mathieu F. Janssen Netherlands 28 2.4k 1.3× 1.3k 1.2× 726 1.8× 421 1.2× 677 2.1× 87 5.8k

Countries citing papers authored by M Deverill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Deverill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Deverill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Deverill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Deverill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Deverill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Deverill. The network helps show where M Deverill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M Deverill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M Deverill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M Deverill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M Deverill. M Deverill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomas, Kirsty, Stephen E. Wright, Thomas Chadwick, et al.. (2015). Extra Physiotherapy in Critical Care (EPICC) Trial Protocol: a randomised controlled trial of intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill. BMJ Open. 5(5). e008035–e008035. 7 indexed citations
3.
Colver, Allan, Hannah Merrick, M Deverill, et al.. (2013). Study protocol: longitudinal study of the transition of young people with complex health needs from child to adult health services. BMC Public Health. 13(1). 675–675. 49 indexed citations
5.
Wilson, Graeme, Ruth McGovern, Grace Antony, et al.. (2012). Brief intervention to reduce risky drinking in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 13(1). 174–174. 9 indexed citations
6.
McIntosh, Emma, Kenny Lawson, Cam Donaldson, et al.. (2012). Report on a Workshop on Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Population Health Interventions: Conceptual and Practical Challenges. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 1 indexed citations
8.
Deverill, M, et al.. (2010). Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women's views on alternative packages of care. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 151(1). 33–37. 14 indexed citations
9.
Robson, SC, Denise Howel, M Deverill, et al.. (2009). Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS). Health Technology Assessment. 13(53). 1–124, iii. 46 indexed citations
10.
Armstrong, Nigel, Luke Vale, M Deverill, et al.. (2009). Surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement: cost effectiveness study. BMJ. 338(apr16 1). b1288–b1288. 37 indexed citations
11.
Lourenço, Tania, Nigel Armstrong, James N’Dow, et al.. (2008). Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement. Health Technology Assessment. 12(35). iii, ix–x, 1. 188 indexed citations
12.
Mackintosh, Joan, et al.. (2006). Randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: pilot study [ISRCTN61522618]. BMC Public Health. 6(1). 162–162. 22 indexed citations
13.
Deverill, M & Stephen C. Robson. (2006). Women's preferences in screening for Down syndrome. Prenatal Diagnosis. 26(9). 837–841. 9 indexed citations
14.
Brazier, John, Jennifer Roberts, & M Deverill. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics. 21(2). 271–292. 2449 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Green, Colin, John Brazier, & M Deverill. (2000). Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life. PharmacoEconomics. 17(2). 151–165. 172 indexed citations
16.
Brooker, Charlie, Philip Molyneux, M Deverill, & Julie Repper. (1999). Evaluating clinical outcome and staff morale in a rehabilitation team for people with serious mental health problems. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 29(1). 44–51. 10 indexed citations
17.
Dixon, Simon, et al.. (1999). Improving the Validity of Economic Evaluations Alongside Controlled Trials. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 4(3). 161–163. 6 indexed citations
18.
Brazier, John, M Deverill, & Colin Green. (1999). A Review of the Use of Health Status Measures in Economic Evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 4(3). 174–184. 150 indexed citations
19.
Deverill, M, John Brazier, Colin Green, & Andrew Booth. (1998). The Use of QALY and Non-QALY Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life. PharmacoEconomics. 13(4). 411–420. 16 indexed citations
20.
MacDonald, John F., L. J. Brandes, M Deverill, et al.. (1991). Mammalian neurons in dissociated cultures form clusters in the presence of retinal pigment epithelium. Experimental Brain Research. 83(3). 643–55. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026