Amber Young

1.9k total citations
76 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Amber Young is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber Young has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Epidemiology, 23 papers in Rehabilitation and 21 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Amber Young's work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (34 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (23 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (12 papers). Amber Young is often cited by papers focused on Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (34 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (23 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (12 papers). Amber Young collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Amber Young's co-authors include A. Toby A. Jenkins, Alexander R. Manara, T J Germon, Thet Naing, Anna Davies, Simon Booth, Diana R. Alves, Jessica Bean, R. J. Nelson and Jane Blazeby and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Fluid Mechanics and Chemical Communications.

In The Last Decade

Amber Young

73 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amber Young United Kingdom 18 312 258 208 201 152 76 1.1k
S. William A. Gunn Lebanon 13 301 1.0× 343 1.3× 154 0.7× 43 0.2× 49 0.3× 32 806
Amir Emami Iran 21 262 0.8× 74 0.3× 127 0.6× 71 0.4× 74 0.5× 96 2.1k
Christian Willy Germany 21 185 0.6× 353 1.4× 154 0.7× 115 0.6× 74 0.5× 112 1.8k
W.A. Dickson United Kingdom 23 542 1.7× 358 1.4× 299 1.4× 31 0.2× 48 0.3× 63 1.2k
Cengiz Açıkel Türkiye 21 393 1.3× 138 0.5× 140 0.7× 38 0.2× 75 0.5× 105 1.7k
Gerald P. Kealey United States 25 629 2.0× 480 1.9× 361 1.7× 47 0.2× 56 0.4× 58 1.6k
Richard Salcido United States 18 113 0.4× 375 1.5× 167 0.8× 32 0.2× 59 0.4× 56 1.1k
Kevin N Foster United States 22 769 2.5× 733 2.8× 362 1.7× 106 0.5× 51 0.3× 125 1.8k
Ändy Wolff Israel 26 193 0.6× 21 0.1× 222 1.1× 78 0.4× 184 1.2× 64 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Young. The network helps show where Amber Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Young. Amber Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Manyara, Anthony Muchai, Philippa Davies, Derek Stewart, et al.. (2023). Definitions, acceptability, limitations, and guidance in the use and reporting of surrogate end points in trials: a scoping review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 160. 83–99. 12 indexed citations
2.
Peck, Michael D., et al.. (2023). Exploring the similarities and differences of variables collected by burn registers globally: protocol for a data dictionary review study. BMJ Open. 13(2). e066512–e066512. 3 indexed citations
3.
Manyara, Anthony Muchai, Philippa Davies, Derek Stewart, et al.. (2022). Protocol for the development of SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions for randomised controlled trials with surrogate primary endpoints: SPIRIT-SURROGATE and CONSORT-SURROGATE. BMJ Open. 12(10). e064304–e064304. 12 indexed citations
4.
5.
Lee, Alice, George Higginbotham, Philippa Davies, & Amber Young. (2022). Research priority setting in plastic and reconstructive surgery: A systematic review. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 76. 148–159. 2 indexed citations
6.
Thorn, Robin, et al.. (2021). Real-time detection of volatile metabolites enabling species-level discrimination of bacterial biofilms associated with wound infection. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 132(3). 1558–1572. 14 indexed citations
7.
Matvienko‐Sikar, Karen, Kerry Avery, Jane Blazeby, et al.. (2021). Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 142. 19–28. 34 indexed citations
8.
Davies, Philippa, Leila Cuttle, & Amber Young. (2021). A Scoping Review of the Methodology Used in Studies of Genetic Influences on the Development of Keloid or Hypertrophic Scarring in Adults and Children After Acute Wounding. Advances in Wound Care. 10(10). 557–570. 7 indexed citations
9.
Lee, Alice, Anna Davies, & Amber Young. (2020). Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients. BMJ Open. 10(11). e040223–e040223. 11 indexed citations
10.
Young, Amber, et al.. (2019). Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care. BMJ Open. 9(2). e025135–e025135. 23 indexed citations
11.
Patenall, Bethany L., George T. Williams, Hollie Hathaway, et al.. (2019). Reaction-based indicator displacement assay (RIA) for the development of a triggered release system capable of biofilm inhibition. Chemical Communications. 55(100). 15129–15132. 13 indexed citations
12.
Young, Amber, Barnaby C Reeves, Hung‐Yuan Cheng, et al.. (2019). Risk of bias and reporting completeness of randomised controlled trials in burn care: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 9(12). e033472–e033472. 2 indexed citations
13.
Davies, Anna, L. Teare, Sian Falder, et al.. (2019). Protocol for the development of a core indicator set for reporting burn wound infection in trials: ICon-B study. BMJ Open. 9(5). e026056–e026056. 4 indexed citations
14.
15.
Hollén, Linda, et al.. (2018). Use of procalcitonin as a biomarker for sepsis in moderate to major paediatric burns. Trauma. 21(3). 192–200. 5 indexed citations
16.
17.
Young, Amber, Sara Brookes, Nichola Rumsey, & Jane Blazeby. (2017). Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set. BMJ Open. 7(6). e017267–e017267. 18 indexed citations
18.
Young, Amber, et al.. (2015). The safety of general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing the application of Biobrane® for small scalds. Burns. 41(6). 1221–1226. 3 indexed citations
19.
Lyttle, Mark D, et al.. (2014). When do children get burnt?. Burns. 40(7). 1322–1328. 14 indexed citations
20.
Young, Amber, et al.. (2007). Toxic shock syndrome in burns: diagnosis and management. Archives of Disease in Childhood Education & Practice. 92(4). ep97–ep100. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. William A. Gunn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amir Emami Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christian Willy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W.A. Dickson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cengiz Açıkel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gerald P. Kealey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard Salcido Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kevin N Foster Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ändy Wolff
Rankless by CCL
2026