Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Meta-analytic Review of Ethical Leadership Outcomes and Moderators
2015465 citationsAkanksha Bedi, Can M. Alpaslan et al.Journal of Business Ethicsprofile →
Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review
2019370 citationsJulie Frizzo-Barker, Peter A. Chow-White et al.International Journal of Information Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandy Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandy Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandy Green more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandy Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandy Green. The network helps show where Sandy Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandy Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandy Green.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandy Green based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sandy Green. Sandy Green is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Frizzo-Barker, Julie, et al.. (2019). Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management. 51. 102029–102029.370 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Green, Sandy. (2018). Life and work of Pestalozzi.
6.
Bedi, Akanksha, Can M. Alpaslan, & Sandy Green. (2015). A Meta-analytic Review of Ethical Leadership Outcomes and Moderators. Journal of Business Ethics. 139(3). 517–536.465 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Goodnight, G. Thomas, et al.. (2014). The Student Debt Bubble. Journal of Cultural Economy. 8(1). 75–100.12 indexed citations
8.
Green, Sandy, et al.. (2012). Looking out and keeping the gate open: Wairarapa archive, New Zealand's greatest little archive. Australasian public libraries and information services. 25(1). 23.2 indexed citations
9.
Green, Sandy, Can M. Alpaslan, & Ian I. Mitroff. (2010). Organizational Inquiry as a Rhetorical Process: The Role of Tropes in Organizational Theory and Methods. 8(1). 46.3 indexed citations
Green, Sandy. (2007). Ten Years of Summer Reading Success: The Eastern and Central Reading Encouragement and Development Network (E. C. Read'n). Australasian public libraries and information services. 20(2). 55.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.