Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Elderly Forgotten? Digital Exclusion in the Information Age and the Rising Grey Digital Divide
This map shows the geographic impact of Reima Suomi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reima Suomi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reima Suomi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reima Suomi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reima Suomi. The network helps show where Reima Suomi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reima Suomi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reima Suomi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reima Suomi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Reima Suomi. Reima Suomi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Li, Hongxiu, et al.. (2019). Knowledge Sharing in a Smoking Cessation Online Community: a Privacy Calculus Perspective.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
6.
Li, Hongxiu, et al.. (2019). Use of Online Health Communities in Smoking Cessation: a Social Support Perspective.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 146.1 indexed citations
Wang, Ping, Hongxiu Li, & Reima Suomi. (2016). Value Co-Creation in Business via Social Media: a Technology Affordance Approach.. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 355.7 indexed citations
12.
Li, Hongxiu, Liu Yong, & Reima Suomi. (2012). Exploring the Different Roles of Service Quality, Satisfaction and Perceived Usefulness in Generating WOM in E-service Context. 35.3 indexed citations
Li, Hongxiu, Liu Yong, & Reima Suomi. (2009). Measurement of E-service Quality: An Empirical Study in Online Travel Service. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1734–1745.44 indexed citations
16.
Puhakainen, Jussi, et al.. (2004). The House That Jack Built: eBusiness Models For SMEs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 41.4 indexed citations
17.
Mendes, Manuel J., et al.. (2004). Digital communities in a networked society : e-commerce, e-business and e-government : the Third IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government (I3E 2003), September 21-24, 2003, São Paulo, Brazil. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Suomi, Reima, et al.. (2001). Organizational and information systems metaphors in the health care sector - from harmonized value chain to realistic market models.. European Conference on Information Systems. 1181–1191.5 indexed citations
19.
Aggarwal, Anil, et al.. (2001). Panel: Web based education (WBE) and diffusion.. European Conference on Information Systems. 1121–1124.1 indexed citations
20.
Suomi, Reima. (2000). Leapfrogging for Modern ICT Usage in the Health Care Sector. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1269–1275.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.