This map shows the geographic impact of S. E. Kruck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. E. Kruck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. E. Kruck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. E. Kruck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. E. Kruck. The network helps show where S. E. Kruck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. E. Kruck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. E. Kruck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. E. Kruck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. E. Kruck. S. E. Kruck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peslak, Alan R., et al.. (2018). Text Messaging Today: A Longitudinal Study of Variables Influencing Text Messaging from 2009 to 2016. 11(3). 25.1 indexed citations
Kruck, S. E., et al.. (2014). Does Personality Play a Role in Computer Information Systems Performance. Issues in Information Systems. 15(2). 383.1 indexed citations
4.
Lee, André, et al.. (2014). The Doctor is in, but is Academia?Re-Tooling IT Education for a New Era in Healthcare. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education. 25(4). 275–281.3 indexed citations
5.
Harris, Nancy L., et al.. (2014). The Impact of a Learner-Centered, Mid-Semester Course Evaluation on Students. The journal of faculty development. 28(3). 55–62.4 indexed citations
6.
He, Wu, Guandong Xu, & S. E. Kruck. (2014). Online IS Education for the 21st Century. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 25(2). 101–105.76 indexed citations
White, Garry L., Barbara Hewitt, & S. E. Kruck. (2013). Incorporating Global Information Security and Assurance in I.S. Education. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 24(1). 11–16.10 indexed citations
9.
Kruck, S. E., et al.. (2009). Interdisciplinary Student Teams Projects: A Case Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 20(3). 325–330.19 indexed citations
Dillon, Thomas W. & S. E. Kruck. (2008). Identifying Employer Needs from Accounting Information Systems Programs.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(4). 403–410.18 indexed citations
Dillon, Thomas W. & S. E. Kruck. (2004). The Emergence of Accounting Information Systems Programs: As More and More Companies Seek out Accounting Professionals with IT Skills, Some Universities Now Are Offering a Major in Accounting Information Systems, Which Mixes Topics from Each Area to Provide Students with the Requisite Skills Employers Want. Management accounting quarterly. 5(3). 29.11 indexed citations
16.
Kruck, S. E., John J. Maher, & Reza Barkhi. (2003). A framework for cognitive skill acquisition and spreadsheet training in end-users. IGI Global eBooks. 212–233.
Kruck, S. E. & Steven D. Sheetz. (2001). Spreadsheet Accuracy Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 12(2). 93–108.10 indexed citations
19.
Kruck, S. E., et al.. (2001). Integrating Student Groupwork Ratings into Student Course Grades. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 12(2). 57–64.4 indexed citations
20.
Forcht, Karen A. & S. E. Kruck. (2001). Physical security models, philosophies, and context. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 10(2). 9.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.