Karen A. Forcht
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Marketing top 10%
- Topics
- Information and Cyber Security (10 papers)Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (10 papers)Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Business EthicsInformation & Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaRussia
In The Last Decade
Karen A. Forcht
36 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Information Systems and Management 189
- Sociology and Political Science 147
- Information Systems 130
- Management Information Systems 82
- Marketing 81
Countries citing papers authored by Karen A. Forcht
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen A. Forcht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen A. Forcht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen A. Forcht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen A. Forcht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen A. Forcht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen A. Forcht. The network helps show where Karen A. Forcht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen A. Forcht
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen A. Forcht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen A. Forcht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen A. Forcht. Karen A. Forcht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | LEGAL METHODS OF USING COMPUTER FORENSICS TECHNIQUES FOR COMPUTER CRIME ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION | 11 |
| 7 | Physical security models, philosophies, and context | 2 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Developing Awareness of Computer Ethics. | 2 |
| 19 | Emerging roles of the MIS professional: Technocrat or change agent? EUC feature | 4 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Karen A. Forcht
Karen A. Forcht is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 43 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information and Cyber Security (10 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (10 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (189 citations), Management Information Systems (82 citations) and Marketing (81 citations). Karen A. Forcht has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michèle White, S. E. Kruck, Robert F. Erbacher, Dennis J. Kulonda, Bryan Marshall and Kelly J. Egan. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Business Ethics and Information & Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.