Ruth Pilkington
- Education top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Epidemiology
- Hepatology top 10%
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Walter KölchAlex von KriegsheimNora RauchCinzia RasoAmaya García-MuñozAmaya Garcia MuñozBoris Ν. KholodenkoG. S. A. McDonald
- Topics
- Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers)Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Ruth Pilkington
25 papers receiving 961 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Education 431
- Molecular Biology 287
- Epidemiology 110
- Hepatology 96
- Cancer Research 95
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Pilkington
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Pilkington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Pilkington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Pilkington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Pilkington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Pilkington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Pilkington. The network helps show where Ruth Pilkington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Pilkington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Pilkington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Pilkington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Pilkington. Ruth Pilkington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 68 | |
| 6 | Use of dialogue for Fellowship | 2 |
| 7 | 116 | |
| 8 | Developing Critical Professional Practice in Education | 0 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | What about Dialogue? An alternative assessment mechanism for professional learning. | 1 |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Developing undergraduate research and inquirybreakdown → | 454 |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 88 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Ruth Pilkington
Ruth Pilkington is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Endocrinology and Education, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (431 citations), Hepatology (96 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (25 citations). Ruth Pilkington has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Walter Kölch, Alex von Kriegsheim, Nora Rauch, Cinzia Raso, Amaya García-Muñoz, Amaya Garcia Muñoz, Boris Ν. Kholodenko, G. S. A. McDonald, Dermot Kelleher and Lan K. Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Journal of Hepatology and Infection and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.