Sara Cohen-Fridel
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Health top 2%
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 0.5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ehud BodnerYoav S. BergmanAmit ShriraYuval PalgiYaakov HoffmanSharon AvidorShoshi KeisariLia Ring
- Topics
- Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- Israel
In The Last Decade
Sara Cohen-Fridel
19 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 647
- Social Psychology 442
- Health 274
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 239
- Applied Psychology 179
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Cohen-Fridel
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Cohen-Fridel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Cohen-Fridel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Cohen-Fridel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Cohen-Fridel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Cohen-Fridel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Cohen-Fridel. The network helps show where Sara Cohen-Fridel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Cohen-Fridel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Cohen-Fridel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Cohen-Fridel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Cohen-Fridel. Sara Cohen-Fridel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The loneliness pandemic: Loneliness and other concomitants of depression, anxiety and their comorbidity during the COVID-19 outbreakbreakdown → | 404 |
| 2 | 108 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 98 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 4 |
About Sara Cohen-Fridel
Sara Cohen-Fridel is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (239 citations), Applied Psychology (179 citations) and Health (274 citations). Sara Cohen-Fridel has collaborated with scholars based in Israel. Frequent co-authors include Ehud Bodner, Yoav S. Bergman, Amit Shrira, Yuval Palgi, Yaakov Hoffman, Sharon Avidor, Shoshi Keisari, Lia Ring, Iulian Iancu and Ephraim S. Grossman. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Affective Disorders and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.