Rohhss Chapman

562 total citations
21 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Rohhss Chapman is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Rohhss Chapman has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Safety Research, 7 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Rohhss Chapman's work include Disability Rights and Representation (13 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers). Rohhss Chapman is often cited by papers focused on Disability Rights and Representation (13 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers). Rohhss Chapman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Rohhss Chapman's co-authors include Elizabeth Tilley, Jane Seale, Melanie Nind, Susan Ledger, Duncan Mitchell, Sarah Earle, Jan Walmsley, Ian Buchanan, Helen Graham and Richard L. Hughes and has published in prestigious journals such as Qualitative Inquiry, The British Journal of Social Work and Disability & Society.

In The Last Decade

Rohhss Chapman

20 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rohhss Chapman United Kingdom 10 208 121 118 97 72 21 361
Andrea Hollomotz United Kingdom 8 197 0.9× 70 0.6× 131 1.1× 94 1.0× 80 1.1× 16 356
Beth Tarleton United Kingdom 11 147 0.7× 86 0.7× 186 1.6× 101 1.0× 65 0.9× 27 316
H.P. Meininger Netherlands 11 203 1.0× 107 0.9× 113 1.0× 95 1.0× 99 1.4× 23 383
Anna Arstein-Kerslake Australia 11 119 0.6× 60 0.5× 185 1.6× 96 1.0× 57 0.8× 36 392
Rachel Fyson United Kingdom 14 153 0.7× 178 1.5× 155 1.3× 93 1.0× 108 1.5× 41 425
Matthew J. Stowe United States 12 103 0.5× 91 0.8× 140 1.2× 49 0.5× 50 0.7× 22 331
Patricia M. Rogan United States 7 221 1.1× 99 0.8× 76 0.6× 39 0.4× 44 0.6× 10 315
Kristín Björnsdóttir Iceland 10 195 0.9× 111 0.9× 88 0.7× 57 0.6× 36 0.5× 17 304
N Hazel United Kingdom 9 71 0.3× 94 0.8× 208 1.8× 217 2.2× 127 1.8× 23 408
Anne‐Marie Callus Malta 9 169 0.8× 78 0.6× 100 0.8× 51 0.5× 24 0.3× 29 262

Countries citing papers authored by Rohhss Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rohhss Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rohhss Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rohhss Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rohhss Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rohhss Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rohhss Chapman. The network helps show where Rohhss Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rohhss Chapman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rohhss Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rohhss Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rohhss Chapman. Rohhss Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Earle, Sarah, et al.. (2020). A critical reflection on accessing women with learning disabilities to participate in research about sensitive subjects through organisational partnerships. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 48(2). 162–169. 5 indexed citations
2.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2017). Between speaking out in public and being person-centred: collaboratively designing an inclusive archive of learning disability history. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 24(8). 889–903. 8 indexed citations
3.
Walmsley, Jan, et al.. (2016). Contraceptive choices for women with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Practice. 19(2). 32–34. 4 indexed citations
4.
Walmsley, Jan, et al.. (2016). The experiences of women with learning disabilities on contraception choice. Primary Health Care. 26(9). 28–32. 10 indexed citations
5.
Earle, Sarah, et al.. (2015). Contraceptive choices for women with learning disabilities. Open Research Online (The Open University). 4 indexed citations
6.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2015). Sexuality and relationships in the lives of people with intellectual disabilities : standing in my shoes. The British Journal of Social Work. 6 indexed citations
7.
Nind, Melanie, Rohhss Chapman, Jane Seale, & Elizabeth Tilley. (2015). The Conundrum of Training and Capacity Building for People with Learning Disabilities Doing Research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 29(6). 542–551. 40 indexed citations
8.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2015). Disabling XAuthors, Disordering TextsX. Qualitative Inquiry. 22(5). 291–300. 3 indexed citations
9.
Seale, Jane, Melanie Nind, Elizabeth Tilley, & Rohhss Chapman. (2015). Negotiating a third space for participatory research with people with learning disabilities: an examination of boundaries and spatial practices. Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research. 28(4). 483–497. 46 indexed citations
10.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2014). Intimacy and Oppression: Sexuality and Relationships in the Lives of People with Intellectual Disabilities. 1 indexed citations
11.
Chapman, Rohhss & Elizabeth Tilley. (2013). Exploring the Ethical Underpinnings of Self-advocacy Support for Intellectually Disabled Adults. Ethics and Social Welfare. 7(3). 257–271. 9 indexed citations
12.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2012). Special Issue on the research and work of people with learning disabilities and their allies and supporters. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 40(2). 83–84. 9 indexed citations
13.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2011). Keeping wartime memory alive: an oral history project about the wartime memories of people with learning difficulties in Cumbria. Disability & Society. 27(1). 31–49. 17 indexed citations
14.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2008). Finding the right support? A review of issues and positive practice in supporting parents with learning difficulties and their children. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 36(1). 75–77. 50 indexed citations
15.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2007). Research project on advocacy and autism. Disability & Society. 22(5). 523–536. 17 indexed citations
16.
Mitchell, Duncan, et al.. (2006). Exploring Experiences of Advocacy by People with Learning Disabilities: Testimonies of Resistance. 31 indexed citations
17.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2006). What they want , yes! But what we want, bugger us!. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 100–107.
18.
Roets, Griet, et al.. (2005). Partnership working between university researchers and self-advocacy organizations. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 9(4). 345–357. 6 indexed citations
19.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2004). Building bridges? The role of research support in self‐advocacy. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 32(2). 77–85. 24 indexed citations
20.
Chapman, Rohhss, et al.. (2004). We are all in the same boat: doing ‘people‐led research’. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 32(2). 72–76. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Hollomotz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Beth Tarleton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H.P. Meininger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna Arstein-Kerslake Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel Fyson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew J. Stowe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia M. Rogan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristín Björnsdóttir Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N Hazel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne‐Marie Callus
Rankless by CCL
2026