Matthew J. Stowe

497 total citations
22 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

Matthew J. Stowe is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew J. Stowe has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Safety Research, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Matthew J. Stowe's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (4 papers). Matthew J. Stowe is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (4 papers). Matthew J. Stowe collaborates with scholars based in United States and Cayman Islands. Matthew J. Stowe's co-authors include H. Rutherford Turnbull, Brennan L. Wilcox, Rud Turnbull, Wayne Sailor, Ann P. Turnbull, Monica Chau, Suzanne Schrandt, Dean Hanlon, Jorge E. Quintero and Craig G. van Horne and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews and Remedial and Special Education.

In The Last Decade

Matthew J. Stowe

21 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew J. Stowe United States 12 140 103 91 66 63 22 331
Maria Timberlake United States 10 299 2.1× 80 0.8× 128 1.4× 193 2.9× 46 0.7× 12 487
Christine Towers United Kingdom 7 170 1.2× 64 0.6× 150 1.6× 37 0.6× 12 0.2× 11 303
Amanda Watkins United States 10 83 0.6× 77 0.7× 217 2.4× 17 0.3× 41 0.7× 24 394
Aleksa Owen United States 11 187 1.3× 112 1.1× 62 0.7× 53 0.8× 9 0.1× 21 321
Theresa Kruczek United States 10 219 1.6× 52 0.5× 72 0.8× 20 0.3× 48 0.8× 22 412
Graham Allen Australia 5 196 1.4× 54 0.5× 189 2.1× 18 0.3× 67 1.1× 14 476
William E. Kiernan United States 11 79 0.6× 207 2.0× 99 1.1× 32 0.5× 33 0.5× 26 344
Claire Tregaskis United Kingdom 10 106 0.8× 199 1.9× 86 0.9× 17 0.3× 32 0.5× 12 409
Magnus Tideman Sweden 12 69 0.5× 142 1.4× 113 1.2× 29 0.4× 10 0.2× 42 385
Curtis Skinner United States 11 105 0.8× 43 0.4× 139 1.5× 14 0.2× 39 0.6× 33 348

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew J. Stowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew J. Stowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew J. Stowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew J. Stowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew J. Stowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew J. Stowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew J. Stowe. The network helps show where Matthew J. Stowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew J. Stowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew J. Stowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew J. Stowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew J. Stowe. Matthew J. Stowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vickrey, Barbara G., et al.. (2024). Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine. Neurology Clinical Practice. 15(1). e200383–e200383.
2.
Chau, Monica, et al.. (2021). Telehealth Sustainability in a Neurosurgery Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic. World Neurosurgery. 152. e617–e624. 5 indexed citations
3.
Turnbull, Rud & Matthew J. Stowe. (2017). A Model for Analyzing Disability Policy. Intellectual and developmental disabilities. 55(4). 223–233. 11 indexed citations
4.
Turnbull, Rud & Matthew J. Stowe. (2014). Elaborating the AAIDD Public Policy Framework. Intellectual and developmental disabilities. 52(1). 1–12. 12 indexed citations
5.
Stowe, Matthew J., et al.. (2007). The Importance of Attitudes toward and Understanding of Disability and Science in the Age of Genetics. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 32(3). 190–206. 2 indexed citations
6.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford, et al.. (2007). Federal family and disability policy: Special relevance for developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 13(2). 114–120. 21 indexed citations
7.
Sailor, Wayne, et al.. (2007). A Case for Adding a Social—Behavioral Standard to Standards-Based Education With Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support as Its Basis. Remedial and Special Education. 28(6). 366–376. 18 indexed citations
8.
Stowe, Matthew J., et al.. (2007). Looking to the Future: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in the Genetics Era. 4 indexed citations
9.
Stowe, Matthew J., et al.. (2006). The Supreme Court, “Our Town,” and Disability Policy: Boardrooms and Bedrooms, Courtrooms and Cloakrooms. Mental Retardation. 44(2). 83–99. 12 indexed citations
10.
Stowe, Matthew J., et al.. (2005). Connections Among the Core Concepts of Health Policy and the Core Concepts of Disability Policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 16(2). 74–83. 3 indexed citations
11.
Sailor, Wayne & Matthew J. Stowe. (2003). The Relationship of Inquiry to Public Policy. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 28(3). 148–152. 10 indexed citations
12.
Wilcox, Brennan L., et al.. (2002). A Brief Overview of Special Education Law with Focus on Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 32(5). 479–493. 24 indexed citations
13.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford, Brennan L. Wilcox, Matthew J. Stowe, & Ann P. Turnbull. (2001). IDEA Requirements for Use of PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 3(1). 11–18. 23 indexed citations
14.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford & Matthew J. Stowe. (2001). Classification, Social Contracts, Obligations, Civil Rights, and the Supreme Court. Remedial and Special Education. 22(6). 374–382. 6 indexed citations
15.
Stowe, Matthew J. & H. Rutherford Turnbull. (2001). Tools for Analyzing Policy "on the Books" and Policy "on the Streets". Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 12(3). 206–216. 16 indexed citations
16.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford, et al.. (2001). The Core Concepts of Disability Policy Affecting Families Who Have Children with Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 12(3). 133–143. 71 indexed citations
17.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford, et al.. (2001). Matrix of Federal Statutes and Federal and State Court Decisions Reflecting the Core Concepts of Disability Policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 12(3). 144–176. 12 indexed citations
18.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford & Matthew J. Stowe. (2001). A Taxonomy for Organizing the Core Concepts According to Their Underlying Principles. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 12(3). 177–197. 28 indexed citations
19.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford & Matthew J. Stowe. (2001). Five Models for Thinking About Disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 12(3). 198–205. 29 indexed citations
20.
Turnbull, H. Rutherford, et al.. (2000). Public Policy Foundations for Positive Behavioral Interventions, Strategies, and Supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2(4). 218–230. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026