Roger A. King

1.3k citations
20 papers · 948 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Roger A. King

20 papers receiving 897 citations

Peers

Roger A. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 336
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 267
  • Metals and Alloys 26
  • Biochemistry 53
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 126
Replace Seiya Inoue with:
Seiya Inoue Japan
Hangyu Li China
Haohai Huang China
Chang‐Hung Kuo Taiwan
Longtao Liu China
Lingling Shi China
Peter W.F. Fischer Canada
Ae‐Son Om South Korea
Roger A. King relative to Seiya Inoue Japan Seiya Inoue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Seiya Inoue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger A. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger A. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger A. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger A. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger A. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger A. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger A. King. The network helps show where Roger A. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger A. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger A. King Line = papers co-authored together Roger A. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1996147
2
Subsea Pipeline Engineering
2004143
3 200789
4 201277
5 199875
6 198667
7 199754
8 199854
9 200450
10 200350
11 200841
12 199527
13 199219
14 199216
15 199210
16 198610
17 19839
18 19945
19 19793
20 20092

About Roger A. King

Roger A. King is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food composition and properties (5 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (4 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (2 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (336 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (267 citations), Metals and Alloys (26 citations), Biochemistry (53 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (126 citations). Roger A. King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard Head, Andrew C. Palmer, Anthony R. Bird, Jessica L. Broadbent, David L. Topping, Richard M. Smith, Manny Noakes, Matthew K. Morell, C. Christophersen and Damien P. Belobrajdic. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Blood Pressure, Early Human Development, British Journal Of Nutrition and Starch - Stärke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact